From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/60985 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ted Zlatanov" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: What's wrong with my spam.el settings now? Date: 20 Sep 2005 12:07:20 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <4nmzm7k9jb.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87mznufe09.fsf@lucien.dreaming> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1127232800 16859 80.91.229.2 (20 Sep 2005 16:13:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: reiner.steib@gmx.de Original-X-From: ding-owner+m9517@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Sep 20 18:13:19 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EHkjU-00078S-Ua for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:12:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1EHkjK-0004PL-00; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:12:26 -0500 Original-Received: from nas01.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.39]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1EHkea-0004PG-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:07:32 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas01.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EHkeY-0008WN-0M for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:07:31 -0500 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu ([134.174.9.41] helo=mail.bwh.harvard.edu) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1EHkeS-0007bJ-00 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:07:24 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 16601 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2005 16:02:38 -0000 Envelope-Sender: tzz@lifelogs.com Envelope-Recipients: ding@gnus.org, reiner.steib@gmx.de, Original-Received: from asimov.bwh.harvard.edu (HELO asimov) (internal?.8?user:?tzz@[134.174.8.118]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.bwh.harvard.edu (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 20 Sep 2005 16:02:37 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org, reiner.steib@gmx.de Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" X-Hashcash: 1:20:050920:ding@gnus.org::93IpC/Ki+SAtTWBs:0000DuLH X-Hashcash: 1:20:050920:reiner.steib@gmx.de::OTP1+ARx+NVBmqVS:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000srY In-Reply-To: <87mznufe09.fsf@lucien.dreaming> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_Lind?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?str=F6m's?= message of "Sun, 07 Aug 2005 08:38:14 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on sysblade0.bwh.harvard.edu X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.8 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:60985 Archived-At: On Sun, 07 Aug 2005, bkhl@elektrubadur.se wrote: > After upgrading to No Gnus (CVS of 20050719) my spam group is behaving > differently. Spam is split to nnml:spam properly, and if I enter that > group and leave, the new spam messages will still have it spam mark, and > when I leave again, it will be processed again. Hi Bjorn, first of all, sorry for the very late response to you and all the other people with spam.el questions (especially Reiner Steib). I was unable to read ding or contribute to Gnus until now. I see from your configuration that spam-mark-only-unseen-as-spam is set. You should only get messages marked as spam once, when you enter the group and they are unseen. After that, they will be unread but not unseen, so they shouldn't be marked as spam again. To confirm, when you enter the second time, is there a dot (.) to the left of the spam-marked article in the summary line? If yes, Gnus is not saving the marks of the articles, that's why you see them marked as spam again. If no, set gnus-verbose to 10 and send me the output in *Messages* when you enter and exit the group twice. Let me know if you need more help. Thanks! Ted > What has changed that I need to compensate for? > > Here are the relevant parts of my configuration: > > ;; Spam > (require 'spam) > (spam-initialize) > > ;; Prevent multiple registration of articles. > (require 'gnus-registry) > (gnus-registry-initialize) > (setq spam-log-to-registry t) > > ;; Use bogofilter for spam processing. > (setq spam-use-bogofilter t) > > ;; Put incoming spam in "spam". > (setq spam-split-group "spam") > > ;; Set spam and ham groups. > (setq gnus-spam-newsgroup-contents > '(("^nnml:spam" gnus-group-spam-classification-spam) > ("^nnml:.*" gnus-group-spam-classification-ham))) > > ;; Train the filter. > (setq spam-process-ham-in-spam-groups t > gnus-spam-process-newsgroups > '(("^nntp\\+news\\.gmane\\.org:" > ((spam spam-use-gmane))) > ("^nnml:.*" > ((spam spam-use-bogofilter))))) > > ;; Move processed spam. > (setq spam-move-spam-nonspam-groups-only t) > (setq spam-mark-only-unseen-as-spam t) > (setq gnus-spam-process-destinations > '(("^nnml:.*" "nnml:spam"))) > > ;; Move processed ham. > (setq spam-mark-ham-unread-before-move-from-spam-group t) > (setq gnus-ham-process-destinations > '(("^nnml:spam" "nnml:reclassify"))) > > ;; Splitting > (setq '(| > (: spam-split) > ...))