Re: gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent

[Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, colman@ppllc.com wrote:

> Does (gnus-registry-initialize) have to be executed before
> (spam-initialize) or is there no interdependency?  

They are completely unrelated.

> BTW is it required that I "(setq spam-use-bogofilter t)" before
> doing (spam-initialize)?

No, you can set it at any time when you're using spam-initialize.

> Using gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent I am seeing messages
> "traced ... to group nil".  Why is it never finding a group to put
> it in?  I'm assuming that this test, when it works, will split
> faster than forcing the email through all my 'any' splits.  Is this
> correct?

Yes.  You can turn up the Gnus verbosity and you'll see messages like

gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent traced <v9ptgfpy12.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> to group ding

Registry: article <4nznfividq.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> spooled to ding

Registry: Registering article 4219 with group sys

You can also do M-: (gnus-registry-fetch-group "x") where "x" is the
Message-ID of a recently received message.  You should get back the
group that the message is in.

Finally, you can look at ~/.gnus.registry.eld and see if it does
indeed hold valid data.

Please don't top-post.

Thanks
Ted