From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49462 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: a short introduction to Gnus vs. Spam with spam.el Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:48:39 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nn0luqtqg.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <4ny95e313a.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1043171305 6703 80.91.224.249 (21 Jan 2003 17:48:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 17:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18b2Vb-0001jr-00 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:48:23 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18b2WB-0003Dj-00; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 11:48:59 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 21 Jan 2003 11:49:54 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA27150 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 11:49:41 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 91317 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2003 17:48:41 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 91312 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2003 17:48:41 -0000 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (134.174.9.41) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 21 Jan 2003 17:48:41 -0000 Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h0LHmdW16477 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:48:39 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id h0LHmdf11719; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:48:39 -0500 (EST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 21 Jan 2003 17:46:40 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090014 (Oort Gnus v0.14) Emacs/21.2 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49462 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49462 On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, larsi@gnus.org wrote: > Ted Zlatanov writes: > >> So, the question is: what should the new "spam" mark be? "$" seems >> an obvious choice; I personally don't like the way it looks in the >> summary buffer with a monospaced font but that's hardly crucial. >> Also, "$" is not as meaningful in countries that don't use dollars. > > But it kinda looks like an "S", which stands for "$PAM". I'm OK with it. Any protests? Other nominations? Ted