From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/61910 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ted Zlatanov" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam manual update for Gnus Date: 8 Feb 2006 15:20:51 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <4noe1h8uvw.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87k6ccjgzr.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4nbqxkmh39.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ek2g8cld.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4nirrsgrfc.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139430304 23333 80.91.229.2 (8 Feb 2006 20:25:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 20:25:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m10439@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Feb 08 21:25:02 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F6vrQ-00080b-HY for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 21:24:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1F6vrL-0001ME-00; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:24:15 -0600 Original-Received: from nas02.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.40]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1F6voA-0001Ia-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:20:58 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas02.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F6vo7-0005bB-GP for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:20:58 -0600 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu ([134.174.9.41] helo=mail.bwh.harvard.edu) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1F6vo5-00082j-00 for ; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 21:20:53 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 14387 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2006 20:14:14 -0000 Envelope-Sender: tzz@lifelogs.com Envelope-Recipients: cyd@stupidchicken.com, ding@gnus.org, Original-Received: from asimov.bwh.harvard.edu (HELO asimov) ([134.174.8.118]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.bwh.harvard.edu (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Feb 2006 20:14:14 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: "Chong Yidong" , ding@gnus.org Original-To: "Chong Yidong" X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" X-Hashcash: 1:20:060208:ding@gnus.org::uT9Mgwt9/OdhihKT:000001bX X-Hashcash: 1:20:060208:cyd@stupidchicken.com::J0Z8Pv+kIXlze7E+:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000088e In-Reply-To: (Reiner Steib's message of "Mon, 06 Feb 2006 23:49:15 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:61910 Archived-At: On 6 Feb 2006, reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc wrote: On Mon, Feb 06 2006, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > >> I see the problem, I am using the Ding CVS, and you are using the >> Emacs CVS. > > Ted, if you don't want to check out Emacs CVS, you can use the v5-10 > branch in Gnus' CVS. Oh, I didn't mean that, in fact I use the Emacs CVS a lot. I was just out of the ding loop for a while, so I didn't know the right way to implement changes like this. Sorry. > The spam.el (and spam-report.el) code differs between the Gnus CVS > trunk and the v5-10 branch (which is synced to/from Emacs CVS). I > think that in the v5-10 branch there is some inconsistency between > code and documentation, see > . I didn't > have time to dig into it, though. (I already mentioned this in a > previous mail to Chong) > > (I didn't look at the patch yet. But...) I'd guess that we should > start from v5-10/Emacs CVS and update to the new code in the trunk > later. Assuming that the next Emacs release is more close than the > next stable Gnus release. The differences are pretty major, and I would actually like to bring the CVS version of spam.el and spam-report.el over to Emacs CVS. There's a lot of bug fixes, but no new features and no bug reports with the CVS version of spam.el/spam-report.el for a while now. Is this possible? That being said, Chong's version of the manual looks good after a first read. I will probably suggest minor changes here and there, but I am really glad he wrote something better than my original version :) Ted