From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/56849 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Regarding spam.el Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:14:35 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4noeqfpagk.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87vfldaj7l.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1080599321 19660 80.91.224.253 (29 Mar 2004 22:28:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 22:28:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M5388=ding+2Daccount=gmane.org@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Mar 30 00:28:36 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B85FE-00050c-00 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:28:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1B85FC-0000hy-01 for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:28:34 -0600 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1B85F7-0000hr-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:28:29 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B85F6-0003KU-5I for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:28:28 -0600 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (clifford.bwh.harvard.edu [134.174.9.41]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA51C3A0042 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:28:26 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from asimov (asimov [134.174.9.63]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id i2TMQWP15858; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:26:32 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Russ Allbery X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: Russ Allbery , ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <87vfldaj7l.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> (Russ Allbery's message of "Tue, 09 Mar 2004 11:55:42 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:56849 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:56849 On Tue, 09 Mar 2004, rra@stanford.edu wrote: > Jonas Steverud writes: > >> 1. Is gnus-group-*-exit-processor-bogofilter obsolete? If so, it >> should be better marked as such in the info file. Same for all >> similar obsolete variables. > > Well, at least in 5.10.6, it doesn't appear to be possible to do > without them. [...] > If I replace those instances of > gnus-group-*-exit-processor-bogofilter with '(spam > spam-use-bogofilter) and the like as described in the manual, exit > processing no longer happens and nothing gets registered with > bogofilter. I tried a few variations with and without the ' and the > ()s and couldn't get it to work. No, this is what should work. The spam-group-processor-p and spam-group-processor-multiple-p do this, and if you can check the former to see if you can trace the bug, it would be helpful. I'll take a look as well when I get a chance. Ted