Re: spam.el and ham in a spam group

[Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, jklymak@coas.oregonstate.edu wrote:
> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

>> Currently it's not, because we only process ham in ham groups, but
>> I can add a setting spam-process-ham-in-nonham-groups if you wish.
> 
> I guess that I would like that.  Well, unless leaving my Inbox as a
> ham group and rehamming the messages over and over is not bad for
> bogofilter.  Its certainly quick enough, so that is not a problem.

I think registering ham many times will skew the bogofilter
statistics, but I don't know for sure since I don't use it personally.

spam-process-ham-in-nonham-groups is added to the CVS spam.el - try it
out and let me know how it goes.

> Here is another problem, and perhaps more important: I have my Inbox
> set so that I do not see "old" (O) or "expired" (E) messages, only
> "important" (!) ones.  Moving "read" (d) items from the spam folder
> into the Inbox made them "old".  So, they do not show up in the
> buffer.  I have to C-u into the group, mark the message as
> "important" so that I can deal with it.
> 
> Can the "important" mark be made a ham mark?  Then I could mark
> important items in my spam group, and have them moved to by Inbox.

Sure, you can customize the gnus-parameter-ham-marks-alist variable or
the ham-marks parameter of the topic or group you want.  Just add
gnus-ticked-mark to the list (it's on the list of possible choices in
the Customize menu now as well, if you use that).

Ted