From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/54646 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam/ham exit processors Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 16:25:28 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nptg916wn.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <76ekwpy35x.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> <4nllqx47mx.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <87ptg9ryb2.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1067894806 9094 80.91.224.253 (3 Nov 2003 21:26:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 21:26:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3187@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Nov 03 22:26:43 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AGmDj-0004tJ-00 for ; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 22:26:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AGmDT-0004ye-00; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:26:27 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AGmDO-0004y9-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:26:22 -0600 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (clifford.bwh.harvard.edu [134.174.9.41]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5435B3A004F for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 15:26:21 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id hA3LPq719854; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 16:25:52 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id hA3LPSO03260; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 16:25:28 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Kai Grossjohann X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: Kai Grossjohann , ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <87ptg9ryb2.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> (Kai Grossjohann's message of "Mon, 03 Nov 2003 20:29:05 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (usg-unix-v) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54646 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54646 On Mon, 03 Nov 2003, kai@emptydomain.de wrote: > Ted Zlatanov writes: > >> On Mon, 03 Nov 2003, colman@ppllc.com wrote: >> >>>>>From my reading of the manual, it seems that the suggested or >>>>anticipated >>> modus operandi is to move spam in a ham-classified group to a >>> spam-classified group for furthur processing and to move ham from >>> a spam-classified group over to a ham-classified group for furthur >>> processing. >> >> Nope, you can process the spam at the point of origin or in a >> central group. Most people like a central "spam" group better. > > Oh! Does this mean that people could set > gnus-spam-process-destinations to nnml:spam, say, then set the > spam-process parameter just on nnml:spam, for it to be added to the > blacklist or whatever? (Whereas spam-process remains unset/nil in > all other groups except nnml:spam?) > > Fascinating. Sure, you could have spam moved from all groups to "nnml:spam" [1] and then process spam only in "nnml:spam". I do that, and furthermore I have the spam-process-destination parameter of "nnml:spam" set to "nnml:train" so I can run SpamAssassin directly on the "nnml:spam" group's file contents. In "nnml:spam" I have the ham-process-destination set to "nnml:mail" and thus when I tick an article in the spam group it gets popped and ham-processed back into "nnml:mail". It's a pretty tidy system. Ted [1] "nnimap+mail.lifelogs.com:spam" actually, but the prefix is not important