From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
Subject: Re: How do you make spam automatically move to spam group on exit?
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 12:15:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4nptozdtx8.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vuou1ebchet.fsf@csa.bu.edu> (Emerick Rogul's message of "Mon, 10 Mar 2003 11:31:22 -0500")
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, emerick@cs.bu.edu wrote:
> Ted Zlatanov writes:
>
>> All groups have Bogofilter as their ham and spam exit processor.
>> (But Bogofilter gets invoked multiple times for the same ham!
>> That's the case for now, unfortunately, since we lack the
>> registry.)
>
> Is it possible to somehow set the expired mark on processed ham so
> that it's not processed again (kind of similar to how spam is
> handled now)?
I suspect most people don't want me to expire their mail...
Perhaps I could introduce a processed-ham-mark, similar to the
forwarded/replied-to marks that are added to an article. But that
does not answer the question of which processor was applied to the
ham/spam. The registry will have to be implemented for this to work
properly, I'm afraid.
> Anyway, it seems that I now have this setup pretty well, and
> BogoFilter's already correctly processing a lot of my incoming spam.
> Thanks for the excellent work on this!
I'm glad it's working for you. I've got to finish the registry one of
these days. I'm working on per-group spam/ham marks, and of course
there's Real Work to be done, but I'll get to it soon. If anyone's
interested in helping, of course, I won't object :)
Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-10 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-07 20:34 Emerick Rogul
2003-03-07 20:56 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-03-07 21:35 ` Emerick Rogul
2003-03-08 6:07 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-03-08 13:21 ` Andreas Fuchs
2003-03-08 15:13 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-03-08 17:10 ` Andreas Fuchs
2003-03-08 17:16 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-03-09 11:33 ` Andreas Fuchs
2003-03-09 6:26 ` Emerick Rogul
2003-03-09 10:59 ` Jorge Godoy
2003-03-09 17:24 ` Emerick Rogul
2003-03-10 15:53 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-03-10 16:31 ` Emerick Rogul
2003-03-10 17:15 ` Ted Zlatanov [this message]
2003-03-10 18:23 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-03-10 15:41 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-03-10 16:20 ` Emerick Rogul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4nptozdtx8.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu \
--to=tzz@lifelogs.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).