From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49582 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: planned spam.el features Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 14:22:58 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nr8b2wdwt.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1043436384 12597 80.91.224.249 (24 Jan 2003 19:26:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 19:26:24 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18c9PR-0002wc-00 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 20:22:37 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18c9Q6-0001LH-00; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 13:23:18 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 24 Jan 2003 13:24:13 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA06368 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 13:24:02 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 10286 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2003 19:23:02 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 10281 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2003 19:23:02 -0000 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (134.174.9.41) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 24 Jan 2003 19:23:02 -0000 Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h0OJMxW29482 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 14:22:59 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id h0OJMxi03383; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 14:22:59 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Ding Mailing List X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: Ding Mailing List User-Agent: Gnus/5.090014 (Oort Gnus v0.14) Emacs/21.2 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49582 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49582 OK, now that spam.el is somewhat stable, I'm going to start working on the next bunch of features: - unified spam score command (`S t' should produce the most sensible score: whichever of [ifile|bogofilter|spam-stat] is set as a spam exit processor on the current group, or whichever the user specifies). This will not unify the spam scores themselves, only the command used to display them. - global message registry to record what messages were processed as spam or ham. This is so a message registered by accident as spam can later be reclassified as ham. - capturing messages when they are accepted, moved, or replaced. This is what I saw in the ifile-gnus.el code - is it sufficient to trap those three article events to track an article as it moves around? What functions should I advise? Examples would be greatly appreciated; the ifile-gnus.el example is only applicable to nnml unfortunately. - optimized training on large numbers of messages, when the spam/ham processor allows it. - better documentation, especially concerning interaction with spam-stat.el - Hashcash support for verifying cookies? Is anyone using this or at least interested? - universal spam/ham scores? -100 to -1 is spam, 0 to 100 is ham. All the backends would be required to produce a unified score. Does anyone think this would be useful? Ted