From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/58041 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ted Zlatanov" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Spam does not move Date: 1 Jul 2004 12:11:29 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nsmcbemha.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <86brkl921y.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net> <4nfz9wcmuq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4n3c5piqtv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4nacz63yy6.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4nzn6s6hro.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4nwu1q5iwj.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1088699435 15929 80.91.224.253 (1 Jul 2004 16:30:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M6582@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Jul 01 18:30:25 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bg4S9-000103-00 for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 18:30:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1Bg4Ru-0005LJ-00; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:30:10 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1Bg4Rq-0005LE-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:30:06 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Bg4Rq-0004oy-2c for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:30:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.bwh.harvard.edu (sysblade0.bwh.harvard.edu [134.174.9.44]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B184C3A0056 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:30:05 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 12972 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2004 16:23:19 -0000 Envelope-Sender: tzz@lifelogs.com Envelope-Recipients: khosoda@venus.dti.ne.jp, ding@gnus.org, Original-Received: from asimov.bwh.harvard.edu (HELO asimov) ([134.174.9.63]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.bwh.harvard.edu (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 1 Jul 2004 16:23:19 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: "Kohkichi Hosoda" , ding@gnus.org Original-To: "Kohkichi Hosoda" X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" In-Reply-To: (Kohkichi Hosoda's message of "Thu, 01 Jul 2004 22:21:59 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:58041 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:58041 On Thu, 01 Jul 2004, khosoda@venus.dti.ne.jp wrote: > Ted> - do M-: (gnus-summary-article-mark 5644) > > do M-: (gnus-summary-article-mark 6029) -> 36 > > Ted> - do M-: (spam-group-spam-mark-p GROUP MARK) where GROUP is the > Ted> group name, usually in gnus-newsgroup-name, and MARK is what > Ted> gnus-summary-article-mark returned. OK, so we know this article is considered spam (36 is the $ character which is the spam mark). > do M-: (spam-group-spam-mark-p kohkichi 36) -> > > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable kohkichi) > (spam-group-spam-mark-p kohkichi 36) > eval((spam-group-spam-mark-p kohkichi 36)) > eval-expression((spam-group-spam-mark-p kohkichi 36) nil) > * call-interactively(eval-expression) Where you put kohkichi, you need either gnus-newsgroup-name OR "nntp:group.name" (or whatever the actual group name is) This is essential, but you don't need to do the preceding gnus-summary-article-mark step, just enter the group and run this step. > Ted> I have the feeling you've somehow removed the spam-mark from the > Ted> list of spam-marks for your ham group. I don't know what else > Ted> the problem could be. > > Group parameters of my HAM group are the followings: > > ((spam-contents gnus-group-spam-classification-ham) > (spam-process > ((spam spam-use-stat) > (ham spam-use-stat))) > (spam-process-destination "nnml:spam") > (spam-marks > (gnus-spam-mark))) Can you please remove the spam-marks parameter altogether? The rest looks OK (if you really have a spam group called "nnml:spam"). Thanks Ted