From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/56848 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Regarding spam.el Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:12:04 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nsmfrpakr.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87vfldaj7l.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1080599176 19359 80.91.224.253 (29 Mar 2004 22:26:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 22:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M5387@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Mar 30 00:26:12 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B85Cu-0004r4-00 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:26:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1B85Cm-0000cb-00; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:26:04 -0600 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1B85Cg-0000c7-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:25:58 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B85Ce-0003H8-Aw for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:25:56 -0600 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (clifford.bwh.harvard.edu [134.174.9.41]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5DB3A0042 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:25:55 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from asimov (asimov [134.174.9.63]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id i2TMO0P15744 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:24:00 -0500 (EST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Jonas Steverud's message of "Wed, 10 Mar 2004 00:34:09 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:56848 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:56848 On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, tvrud@bredband.net wrote: > Russ Allbery writes: > >> If I replace those instances of >> gnus-group-*-exit-processor-bogofilter with '(spam >> spam-use-bogofilter) and the like as described in the manual, exit >> processing no longer happens and nothing gets registered with >> bogofilter. > > So what you're saying is that the documentation is *ahead* of the > code, and not, as usually is the case, lagging? What a strange world > it is... ;-) As the saying goes, if the code and docs disagree, they are both wrong :) Ted