Re: Spam/Ham training

[Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003, zedek@gnu-rox.org wrote:

> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> disait récemment que :

>> 1) process spam when it leaves other groups on its way to
>> train_spam - this is the "normal way"
> 
> So it implicitly forces me to set one spam/ham processor per group,
> right ?

No, you can use topic/group parameters or regular expressions to set
exit spam/ham processors more easily.

>> 2) enter train_spam, mark all articles as spam, and exit - this
>>    will process them all with train_spam's spam processor.  This
>>    should be possible to automate, if (1) is no good for you.
> 
> I just tried this solution and AFAIK, my bogofilter wordlist.db has
> not changed :( I tend to think there is s/th wrong with that, huh ?

It could be a bug, sure.  Send me your configuration and (after
setting gnus-verbose to 10) the log when you enter a group, mark spam,
and exit.  That will tell me if something's wrong with your setup and
maybe if there is a bug.

Ted