From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/55072 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Spam/Ham training Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:36:48 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nsmk13irz.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <4nhe0kfdt0.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <4nd6b8uh54.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <4n4qwig8o5.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1070473151 27022 80.91.224.253 (3 Dec 2003 17:39:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3612@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Dec 03 18:39:09 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ARaxw-0003I2-00 for ; Wed, 03 Dec 2003 18:39:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1ARax7-0006A8-00; Wed, 03 Dec 2003 11:38:17 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1ARax0-0006A2-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 03 Dec 2003 11:38:10 -0600 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (clifford.bwh.harvard.edu [134.174.9.41]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDB13A003E for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 11:38:08 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id hB3HbM705088 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 12:37:22 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id hB3Ham600088; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 12:36:48 -0500 (EST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Xavier Maillard's message of "Wed, 03 Dec 2003 00:56:50 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (usg-unix-v) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55072 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55072 On Wed, 03 Dec 2003, zedek@gnu-rox.org wrote: > Ted Zlatanov disait r=E9cemment que : >> 1) process spam when it leaves other groups on its way to >> train_spam - this is the "normal way" >=20 > So it implicitly forces me to set one spam/ham processor per group, > right ? No, you can use topic/group parameters or regular expressions to set exit spam/ham processors more easily. >> 2) enter train_spam, mark all articles as spam, and exit - this >> will process them all with train_spam's spam processor. This >> should be possible to automate, if (1) is no good for you. >=20 > I just tried this solution and AFAIK, my bogofilter wordlist.db has > not changed :( I tend to think there is s/th wrong with that, huh ? It could be a bug, sure. Send me your configuration and (after setting gnus-verbose to 10) the log when you enter a group, mark spam, and exit. That will tell me if something's wrong with your setup and maybe if there is a bug. Ted