Re: spam.el and ham in a spam group

[Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, cmg@sourcefire.com wrote:
> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
> 
>> I hope this clarifies the process.
> 
> How should ham in a spam group be handled?  AFAICT, the
> ham-exit stuff only runs in a ham group.

The original message that started this thread asked this question
(hence the subject), and I answered that I will add a flag to process
ham from a spam group.

> The common tasks that I have to do are:
> 
>  - unregister a message as spam if I didn't catch it was a false
>    positive on the first exit from a spam group
> 
>   ( doing this manually via )
> 
>     C-x h M-| bogofilter -S  C-x h M-| bogofilter -n
> 
>  - register a message as non-spam if I catch it the first time
> 
>     C-x h M-| bogofilter -n
> 
>    instead of not registering it at all
> 
> I may very well be missing something obvious. M-d handles the spam
> in the ham group very well although I'm not positive it does the
> unregister step.

Unregistering and generally tracking spam/ham registrations won't be
done until the registry is hooked up with spam.el.  It's a planned
feature but won't be done right away due to lack of time.  Sorry.

Ted