From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/53514 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam.el and ham in a spam group Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 15:43:52 -0400 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nsmox9gg7.fsf@chubby.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <4nd6g2vb00.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <4ny8ypfg7u.fsf@holmes.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1058989529 18968 80.91.224.249 (23 Jul 2003 19:45:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:45:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M2058@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Jul 23 21:45:28 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19fPWs-0004nz-00 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 21:44:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19fPXP-0002B9-00; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 14:44:35 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 19fPXH-0002AV-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 14:44:27 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 86947 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2003 19:44:26 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 86942 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2003 19:44:26 -0000 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (134.174.9.41) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 23 Jul 2003 19:44:26 -0000 Original-Received: from chubby.bwh.harvard.edu (chubby [134.174.9.50]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h6NJhrH00776; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 15:43:55 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by chubby.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id h6NJhq703208; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 15:43:52 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Chris Green X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: Chris Green , ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Chris Green's message of "Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:38:17 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (usg-unix-v) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53514 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53514 On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, cmg@sourcefire.com wrote: > Ted Zlatanov writes: > >> I hope this clarifies the process. > > How should ham in a spam group be handled? AFAICT, the > ham-exit stuff only runs in a ham group. The original message that started this thread asked this question (hence the subject), and I answered that I will add a flag to process ham from a spam group. > The common tasks that I have to do are: > > - unregister a message as spam if I didn't catch it was a false > positive on the first exit from a spam group > > ( doing this manually via ) > > C-x h M-| bogofilter -S C-x h M-| bogofilter -n > > - register a message as non-spam if I catch it the first time > > C-x h M-| bogofilter -n > > instead of not registering it at all > > I may very well be missing something obvious. M-d handles the spam > in the ham group very well although I'm not positive it does the > unregister step. Unregistering and generally tracking spam/ham registrations won't be done until the registry is hooked up with spam.el. It's a planned feature but won't be done right away due to lack of time. Sorry. Ted