From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/59778 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ted Zlatanov" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gmail-like mail backend? Date: 11 Feb 2005 13:10:03 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <4nu0ojhssk.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <4n7jlgcnlj.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zmyc57n6.fsf@koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1108145352 4843 80.91.229.2 (11 Feb 2005 18:09:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:09:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M8319@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Feb 11 19:09:11 2005 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13] ident=mail) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CzfE2-0000t3-Jf for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:09:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CzfFF-0003Ox-00; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:10:21 -0600 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CzfFB-0003Os-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:10:17 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CzfF2-00037k-Uv for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:10:09 -0600 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu ([134.174.9.41] helo=mail.bwh.harvard.edu) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CzfF1-0006mB-00 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:10:07 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 10941 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2005 18:09:48 -0000 Envelope-Sender: tzz@lifelogs.com Envelope-Recipients: asjo@koldfront.dk, ding@gnus.org, Original-Received: from asimov.bwh.harvard.edu (HELO asimov) (internal?.8?user:?tzz@[134.174.8.118]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.bwh.harvard.edu (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Feb 2005 18:09:47 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: "Adam =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F8gren?=" , ding@gnus.org Original-To: "Adam =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F8gren?=" X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" X-Hashcash: 1:20:050211:asjo@koldfront.dk::QNqG7Y/hxnWy3EAZ:000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001asR X-Hashcash: 1:20:050211:ding@gnus.org::w/Oa71X1fTbRUIJk:00002mdM In-Reply-To: <87zmyc57n6.fsf@koldfront.dk> (Adam =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F8gren'?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?s?= message of "Fri, 11 Feb 2005 00:15:25 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.8 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on sysblade0.bwh.harvard.edu X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu X-MailScanner-From: ding-owner+m8319@lists.math.uh.edu X-MailScanner-To: ding-account@gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59778 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59778 On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, asjo@koldfront.dk wrote: On 10 Feb 2005 12:48:56 -0500, Ted wrote: >> Look at my previous posts in ding on "message labels" that someone >> was going to implement. > > (I think I was babbling about that, but I haven't gotten around to > trying to actually do something. Lack of time and knowledge on my > part). No rush, Miles' proposal may work together with yours though. >> This can be done with the registry - just associate the labels as >> extra data with the message ID, and you can find the message by the >> message ID. > > How would this work in conjunction with setting > gnus-registry-max-entries to something besides nil? > > (I'd like to forget information about old spam, but I'd never ever > want to forget about labels I have assigned). I can fix gnus-registry-trim so it knows certain kinds of extra data mean the article should not be expired when the registry is trimmed. If you mean the article label should stay even after the article is deleted, that can be arranged too. gnus-registry-trim-articles-without-groups controls this right now. I actually fixed a bug related to this right now, as well. Ted