Re: spam.el: automatically resplitting ham in a spam group?

[Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, lorentey@elte.hu wrote:

>> I could make a ham-destination option to use 'respool instead of a
>> group name, but just recently there was discussion of a nnimap bug
>> with respooling.  What if the respooling returns nil, do we leave
>> the ham message in the spam group?
> 
> Hm.  What if spam-split would simply be disabled during the ham-exit
> respool?

That's not necessarily the only problem.  The real issue is that the
destination is being decided dynamically, so every function in the
splitting sequence would have to know that returning the name of the
current group is not OK - we don't want the ham to stay in the spam
group, no matter what.  I hope you see the problem now.

Ted