From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/54873 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam.el: automatically resplitting ham in a spam group? Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 08:28:31 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nu14zjhj4.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <4nfzgkdqzx.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1069335018 17592 80.91.224.253 (20 Nov 2003 13:30:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:30:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3413@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Nov 20 14:30:16 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AMosx-0007BO-00 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:30:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AMosY-0000M7-00; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:29:50 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AMosP-0000Lz-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:29:41 -0600 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (clifford.bwh.harvard.edu [134.174.9.41]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD4E3A0026 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:29:41 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id hAKDT2725423; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 08:29:03 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id hAKDSWo08320; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 08:28:32 -0500 (EST) Original-To: lorentey@elte.hu (=?utf-8?q?L=C5=91rentey_K=C3=A1roly?=) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: lorentey@elte.hu (=?utf-8?q?L=C5=91rentey_K=C3=A1roly?=), ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=28L=C5=91rentey_K=C3=A1roly's?= message of "Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:19:12 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (usg-unix-v) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54873 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54873 On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, lorentey@elte.hu wrote: >> I could make a ham-destination option to use 'respool instead of a >> group name, but just recently there was discussion of a nnimap bug >> with respooling. What if the respooling returns nil, do we leave >> the ham message in the spam group? > > Hm. What if spam-split would simply be disabled during the ham-exit > respool? That's not necessarily the only problem. The real issue is that the destination is being decided dynamically, so every function in the splitting sequence would have to know that returning the name of the current group is not OK - we don't want the ham to stay in the spam group, no matter what. I hope you see the problem now. Ted