Re: [Q]: Question on a spam variable

["Ted Zlatanov" <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, zedek@gnu-rox.org wrote:

> The docstring for `gnus-spam-newsgroup-contents' is weird
> 
> It states that all groups listed are considered as spam groups
> but we have to associate each group with a classification that
> can be different from spam.

Thanks for noticing that.  It's not only meaningful for mail groups
anymore, so that's another doc bug :)

I have rewritten the docsctring to:

   "*Group classification (spam, ham, or neither).  Only meaningful
when spam.el is loaded.  If non-nil, this should be a list of group
name regexps, associated with a classification.  In spam groups, new
articles are marked as spam on summary entry.  There is other behavior
associated with ham and no classification when spam.el is loaded - see
the manual."

Let me know if it's still unclear.

Ted