Re: bogofilter config

[Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, colman@ppllc.com wrote:

>>>>>> "TZ" == Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
> 
>    TZ> Turn up the Gnus verbosity and look at the log.  It should
>    TZ> tell you "Registering ham with Bogofilter" which means what
>    TZ> it says.  If it doesn't, you either have the
>    TZ> ham-exit-processor, the group type or the ham marks wrong.
>    TZ> Also try spam-process-ham-in-nonham-groups or
>    TZ> spam-process-ham-in-spam-groups (the latter is more
>    TZ> restrictive, the former works in all groups), in case the
>    TZ> group type is wrong but you want ham processing in it anyway.
> 
> I've done this and, yes, I am seeing "Registering ham with
> Bogofilter".  But, no, the timestamp on wordlist.db did not change.
> 
> I am not using any variables (e.g. spam-process-ham-in-spam-groups),
> in my config at all.  I am just using G-c to customize the following
> variables:
> 
>        the classification (ham/spam)
>        the exit processor for ham/spam (both using bogofilter)
>        the disposition (do nothing for ham, expire spam)
> 
> Where do I go from here?

Assuming this is only one group that's problematic, do `G p' on the
group and send me the output - it should be some Lisp-like
expressions.

Ted