Re: Gnus SPAM support, and email based reporting.

["Ted Zlatanov" <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

Daniel Pittman wrote:
> Well, I don't believe that we *can* find a valid default value.
> I certainly know of nothing that would work for ever a small proportion
> of people, let alone a majority.

> This isn't unprecedented within Emacs either; PSGML already does this
> for `user-email-address'.

OK, that's fine then.  Comitted.

> I don't think that this should be the recommended way of setting the
> value, either, just that it is the nicest option when we don't have a
> value already - and it isn't likely to trigger in any automated setup
> that I can see...

> >> No handling of the group stuff yet, because I am not sure where that
> >> is best hooked in.
> >
> > I looked at gnus.el, and the attached patch adds the parameter.  Let
> > me know if the *parameter* looks OK and I can add the rest of the glue
> > to make spam.el do a lexical let on spam-report-resend-to.

> At the moment the code only deals with a string `spam-report-resend-to';
> I wonder if it is best to support more than one address there...

No, I don't think that's necessary.  It would add extra complexity and
I really doubt it's all that useful to have multiple resend-to
addresses.

Try out the code I just comitted and let me know how it works for you.

Ted