From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/57687 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ted Zlatanov" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus SPAM support, and email based reporting. Date: 24 May 2004 14:50:19 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nwu314q38.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87isfy7p6a.fsf@enki.rimspace.net> <1xmm1vhg.fsf@random.localnet.unwireduniverse.com> <4nzn95gwu7.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lljt2534.fsf@enki.rimspace.net> <4nfz9xbirq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87d64uaxpg.fsf@enki.rimspace.net> <4naczyj5xf.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87isellxhu.fsf@enki.rimspace.net> <4noeod67v8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vfilitqw.fsf@enki.rimspace.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1085425672 13171 80.91.224.253 (24 May 2004 19:07:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 19:07:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M6227@lists.math.uh.edu Mon May 24 21:07:43 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BSKnX-0007i8-00 for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 21:07:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BSKn8-0000i8-00; Mon, 24 May 2004 14:07:18 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BSKn3-0000i3-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 24 May 2004 14:07:13 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BSKn0-0003UK-Pt for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 24 May 2004 14:07:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.bwh.harvard.edu (sysblade0.bwh.harvard.edu [134.174.9.44]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E293A0050 for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 14:07:09 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 9670 invoked from network); 24 May 2004 19:01:28 -0000 Envelope-Sender: tzz@lifelogs.com Envelope-Recipients: daniel@rimspace.net, ding@gnus.org, Original-Received: from asimov.bwh.harvard.edu (HELO asimov) ([134.174.9.63]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.bwh.harvard.edu (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 24 May 2004 19:01:28 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: "Daniel Pittman" , ding@gnus.org Original-To: "Daniel Pittman" X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" In-Reply-To: <87vfilitqw.fsf@enki.rimspace.net> (Daniel Pittman's message of "Tue, 25 May 2004 04:07:35 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57687 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57687 Daniel Pittman wrote: > Well, I don't believe that we *can* find a valid default value. > I certainly know of nothing that would work for ever a small proportion > of people, let alone a majority. > This isn't unprecedented within Emacs either; PSGML already does this > for `user-email-address'. OK, that's fine then. Comitted. > I don't think that this should be the recommended way of setting the > value, either, just that it is the nicest option when we don't have a > value already - and it isn't likely to trigger in any automated setup > that I can see... > >> No handling of the group stuff yet, because I am not sure where that > >> is best hooked in. > > > > I looked at gnus.el, and the attached patch adds the parameter. Let > > me know if the *parameter* looks OK and I can add the rest of the glue > > to make spam.el do a lexical let on spam-report-resend-to. > At the moment the code only deals with a string `spam-report-resend-to'; > I wonder if it is best to support more than one address there... No, I don't think that's necessary. It would add extra complexity and I really doubt it's all that useful to have multiple resend-to addresses. Try out the code I just comitted and let me know how it works for you. Ted