Re: spam.el reporting and moving ham out of spam groups.

["Ted Zlatanov" <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

On Thu, 27 May 2004, daniel@rimspace.net wrote:

> I did need to make a couple of changes to get `spam-report-by-resend' to
> do the right thing with the new group parameter you added, though.
> 
> Your code would bind the result of searching for the group parameter as
> the value of `spam-report-resend-to' unconditionally, which means that
> where the group parameter did not exist, the value was `nil'.
> 
> This then triggered the "no set resend address" logic which, of course,
> didn't actually set the variable as expected, resulting in things not
> working as expected.
> 
> If there *was* a group parameter, the result was a list containing a
> string with the destination address, not the address itself. That needed
> to be unpacked before resending...

Oops, sorry!  Comitted to CVS now (note the use of car-safe, and
lines have to be less than 80 chars).

Thanks
Ted