From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/54890 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam.el: automatically resplitting ham in a spam group? Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:22:41 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4ny8ubyppq.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: <4nfzgkdqzx.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <4nptfnjhbb.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1069345445 13388 80.91.224.253 (20 Nov 2003 16:24:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3430@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Nov 20 17:24:01 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AMrb7-0003Ba-00 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:24:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AMrb0-0002Ho-00; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:23:54 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AMraw-0002Hj-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:23:50 -0600 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (clifford.bwh.harvard.edu [134.174.9.41]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53813A0026 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:23:49 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id hAKGNA701751; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:23:10 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id hAKGMfl09559; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:22:41 -0500 (EST) Original-To: lorentey@elte.hu (=?utf-8?q?L=C5=91rentey_K=C3=A1roly?=) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: lorentey@elte.hu (=?utf-8?q?L=C5=91rentey_K=C3=A1roly?=), ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=28L=C5=91rentey_K=C3=A1roly's?= message of "Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:48:40 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (usg-unix-v) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54890 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54890 On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, lorentey@elte.hu wrote: > I see. But I don't think it is normal that spam-split (or some > other nil-returning function) would be at the end of the split > specification. That's never stopped anyone :) Let me give you an example: gnus-use-ifile is guaranteed to return a group name. So the user makes spam-split the last entry in the split rules. Eventually the user decides to turn spam-use-ifile off. It's not a farfetched scenario at all. > IMHO most of this (except infrequent the nil case) would be > eliminated by disabling spam-split. Well, try it with the current respool behavior and let's see how it works. It may be that all this worrying was unnecessary. Thanks Ted