From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/59805 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ted Zlatanov" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [BUG?]: Spam issue Date: 14 Feb 2005 11:37:28 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <4nzmy7qerb.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1108498628 27649 80.91.229.2 (15 Feb 2005 20:17:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M8343@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Feb 15 21:17:08 2005 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D196O-0005pa-NU for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:15:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1D194g-0000mJ-00; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:13:35 -0600 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1D18xa-0000MB-02 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:06:14 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1D0jEG-0008Ck-Vz for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:37:45 -0600 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu ([134.174.9.41] helo=mail.bwh.harvard.edu) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D0jE7-0003WU-00 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:37:35 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 20228 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2005 16:37:12 -0000 Envelope-Sender: tzz@lifelogs.com Envelope-Recipients: ding@gnus.org, Original-Received: from asimov.bwh.harvard.edu (HELO asimov) (internal?.8?user:?tzz@[134.174.8.118]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.bwh.harvard.edu (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 14 Feb 2005 16:37:10 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" X-Hashcash: 1:20:050214:ding@gnus.org::R5BU+yMfJzPJEiZ9:00005u7Y In-Reply-To: (Xavier Maillard's message of "Sat, 12 Feb 2005 23:18:22 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.8 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on sysblade0.bwh.harvard.edu X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu X-MailScanner-From: ding-owner+m8343@lists.math.uh.edu X-MailScanner-To: ding-account@gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59805 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59805 On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, zedek@gnu-rox.org wrote: > When using `gnus-parameters' this way: > > ,---- >| '((".*" >| (total-expire . t) >| ;; (expiry-wait . immediate) >| ;; (expiry-target . delete) >| (display . default) >| (spam-contents gnus-group-spam-classification-ham) >| (spam-process ((ham spam-use-bogofilter)))) > `---- > > and setting my classification with: > > ,---- >| (setq gnus-spam-newsgroup-contents >| '(("INBOX.mail.spam" gnus-group-spam-classification-spam))) > `---- > > makes my Gnus still thinks that my spam group is not: > > ,---- >| ELISP> (gnus-parameter-spam-contents "INBOX.mail.spam") >| (gnus-group-spam-classification-ham) >| >| ELISP> > `---- > > Is this the expected behavior ? I don't think the behavior is explicitly defined. There are multiple ways to specify a setting in Gnus and you just found out the hard way why it's a bad idea to do that :) Ted