From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/57974 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ted Zlatanov" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Spam does not move Date: 24 Jun 2004 12:30:03 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nzn6s6hro.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <86brkl921y.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net> <4nfz9wcmuq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4n3c5piqtv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4nacz63yy6.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1088095754 4605 80.91.224.253 (24 Jun 2004 16:49:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M6515@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Jun 24 18:48:49 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BdXP6-0007Mj-00 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:48:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BdXOf-0002zK-00; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:48:21 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BdXOX-0002zE-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:48:13 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BdXOW-0000gO-Pe for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:48:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.bwh.harvard.edu (sysblade0.bwh.harvard.edu [134.174.9.44]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096263A0047 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:48:11 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 28920 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2004 16:41:38 -0000 Envelope-Sender: tzz@lifelogs.com Envelope-Recipients: khosoda@venus.dti.ne.jp, ding@gnus.org, Original-Received: from asimov.bwh.harvard.edu (HELO asimov) ([134.174.9.63]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.bwh.harvard.edu (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 24 Jun 2004 16:41:37 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: "Kohkichi Hosoda" , ding@gnus.org Original-To: "Kohkichi Hosoda" X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" In-Reply-To: (Kohkichi Hosoda's message of "Sat, 19 Jun 2004 01:00:46 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57974 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57974 On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, khosoda@venus.dti.ne.jp wrote: >>>>>> On 14 Jun 2004 12:07:45 -0400, "Ted Zlatanov" said: > > Ted> The new version of spam.el which I just posted to the ding list > Ted> has new logic for moving spam out. Can you test with that > Ted> version and let me know what happens? > > Unfortunately, the new version does not change the situation. Spam > mail marked with "O" in ham group still does not go into spam group > when I exited the summary buffer of the ham group. I'm pretty sure this is not a problem with spam.el, but either with your configuration or with another part of Gnus (maybe the agent?) Put this: (debug (spam-list-articles gnus-newsgroup-articles 'spam)) at line 1296 of spam.el, just before ;; do the non-moving backends first, then the moving ones (dolist (backend-type '(non-mover mover)) Then do M-x eval-buffer, and try to repeat the behavior. When you quit the summary, you'll see a buffer that will show you the list of spam-marked messages. At least one, the one you marked as spam, should be in it, represented as an integer. If it's not, something is very wrong with your gnus-newsgroup-articles. Or maybe you've customized your spam-marks variable, though no one has ever done that to my knowledge... I've spent hours testing this, and I simply can't find the bug you describe. I don't doubt your experience, but it's very difficult to debug a problem that I can't duplicate. Maybe you should try debugging the spam-summary-prepare-exit function yourself or get someone local that knows Emacs well to help you. Ted (to undo the changes above, undo them in spam.el and do M-x eval-buffer again)