From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/51485 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam.el and Procmail splitting strategy? Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 13:48:28 -0400 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <4nznmrabyr.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1050428886 11796 80.91.224.249 (15 Apr 2003 17:48:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 17:48:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: From Original-X-From: ding-owner+M29@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Apr 15 19:48:04 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 195UXL-00033T-00 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 19:48:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 195UXp-0001Ne-00; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 12:48:33 -0500 Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 195UXl-0001NZ-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 12:48:29 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 16839 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2003 17:48:29 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 16834 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2003 17:48:29 -0000 Original-Received: from clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (134.174.9.41) by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 15 Apr 2003 17:48:29 -0000 Original-Received: from lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (lockgroove [134.174.9.133]) by clifford.bwh.harvard.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h3FHmSI28123; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 13:48:28 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from tzz@localhost) by lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.0) id h3FHmSV05564; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 13:48:28 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Jody Klymak X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: Jody Klymak , From In-Reply-To: (Jody Klymak's message of "Mon, 14 Apr 2003 12:49:32 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) Emacs/21.3 (usg-unix-v) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:51485 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:51485 On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, jklymak@coas.oregonstate.edu wrote: > Ted Zlatanov writes: > >> Well, I was thinking of a 'respool spam/ham process destination, as >> suggested before, which would resubmit the spam/ham mail to the >> spool process from any mailbox. Would that work for you? > > Not sure if that would work. Does imap support re-spooling? Yes, AFAIK. > I am pretty happy taking bbdb out of my .procmail and splitting it > in gnus instead. It does, however, seem that this will end up being > a generic problem if other mail groups get infected. Doing all my > splitting in gnus may be a good option - it just means that I need > to have a gnus running at all times on my main machine. Yes, that's annoying. I tend to use IMAP for the mail I want shared between machines, that works nicely. Two machines running IMAP won't conflict, you only have to make sure they are splitting the same way (so if you use BBDB for splitting, for instance, you need to make sure your BBDB database is synchronized between machines). > It seems that it should be possible to spam-split new messages in > any group upon entry. I guess it just doesn't fit with the existing > splitting mechanism. Perhaps the splitting mechanism not be > extended so that the last argument in nnimap-split-fancy is > something like "current-split-inbox" instead of a single mail box? [...] > Of course, I have no idea how the splitting code is written so that > may not be easy. I'm afraid I'm pretty ignorant of the splitting internals. Perhaps someone better acquainted with them can answer. Ted