From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/33057 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Doran Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: ognus Date: 31 Oct 2000 17:49:03 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <5266m9klc0.fsf@sean.ebone.net> References: <2nwvetu80i.fsf@tiger.jia.vnet> <200010291739.RAA06135@djlvig.dl.ac.uk> <200010302322.XAA08221@djlvig.dl.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035169235 23141 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:00:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:00:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA0CD049A for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 11:49:50 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAB18961; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:49:35 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:48:56 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA19349 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:48:45 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sean.ebone.net (sean.ebone.net [195.158.227.211]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBE1D049A for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 11:49:05 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by sean.ebone.net (Postfix, from userid 1113) id 340F4897; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:49:04 +0100 (CET) Original-To: Per Abrahamsen In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 38 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33057 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33057 Per Abrahamsen writes: > Footnotes: > [1] Someone pointed out that using CVS to retrieve a specific tagged > release make sense, also for end-users. Yes, iff it's an operation identical to one of: 1. grab compressed tar file from ftp/www archive extract it or 1. grab compressed tar file from ftp/www archive extract it 2. grab patches relevant to this tar file from ftp/www archive extract and apply them Both are done fairly commonly, and in CVS land one could have various mechanisms for supporting both simultaneously. For example: (for the first option) cvs co -P -rgnus-5.8.7_release (for the second option) cvs co -P -rgnus-5.8.7_patched with a "DO NOT EVER TOUCH" understanding about the first tag above. "cvs co -P" with no tag at all should always result in the latest development sources, and may catch fire, explode, leak battery acid, eat your mail, send spam, or whatnot. You have been warned. When there is consensus among the people actually supporting CVS Gnus about the way to go, someone should kindly figure out how to make this clear on http://www.gnus.org/distribution/ Sean.