From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/65089 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Daiki Ueno" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: NotDashEscaped, what? Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:22:28 +0900 Message-ID: <54a15d860708270722n1652d373n68471e6eb11da91a@mail.gmail.com> References: <87r6lpcn4l.fsf@cadilhac.name> <54a15d860708270349x29f0fb36g981f322a544db777@mail.gmail.com> <87fy25ci7q.fsf@cadilhac.name> <54a15d860708270617n7c9f5aa5w41f4404f6710dac8@mail.gmail.com> <878x7xcc7j.fsf@cadilhac.name> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1188224601 7973 80.91.229.12 (27 Aug 2007 14:23:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:23:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl_Cadilhac?=" Original-X-From: ding-owner+M13597@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Aug 27 16:23:18 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IPfUk-00071B-Il for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:23:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IPfUH-0000rD-Uf; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:22:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IPfUG-0000qx-56 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:22:40 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IPfUD-0004GU-LW for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:22:40 -0500 Original-Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.178]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1IPfUC-0001y6-00 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:22:36 +0200 Original-Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so1197859pyh for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 07:22:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Xi5L3U3wUYRwve+jEAQBcphHTCt/T5+Tqg8AidqFkDCxTIf4+S2cy3XHy95MOWaGQOQ+HYSFTKwI7kpGnFLi8jqSW1F16O3DAA8Ck4NrwQOf3v4e5Hi+1BVTu/cPnjBhPimj38e22ZHW5jhA0omezfHllHb8cs/589rClVmEsKo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=orvf1FXwWtpAvq2oCzAQDR10DUlP/uFxeXuk2/WZigNyu31VDglY0kyYt3AmkLBBIRlmqjHQZGowZxuTQ3DaFGd9rxfdSBL228EUGfpiQBbpw9OVOB8dREGExidDgQ3qs9eVc1iTjDPrD2/cnqS7bgRvEhF4aaiTj2bVVJ+mF7s= Original-Received: by 10.35.44.16 with SMTP id w16mr7613533pyj.1188224548442; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 07:22:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.35.128.7 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 07:22:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878x7xcc7j.fsf@cadilhac.name> Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 873ecf494a2e3918 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:65089 Archived-At: 2007/8/27, Micha=EBl Cadilhac : > > However, if NotDashEscaped is removed, we should also treat the > > original text as *not* dash-escaped. Otherwise, the contents you will > > see is not what signed in the clearsigned message. I personally think > > this is not a big problem though. > > I don't really understand, the NotDashEscaped header is not used to > compute the signature, is it? No, but suppose the following case: the original text contains a line led by "- " (0x2D 0x20) as it is, and NotDashEscaped is specified by the sender. You will see the "- " prefix removed by Gnus. Regards, --=20 Daiki Ueno