From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/65120 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Daiki Ueno" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: PGG and EasyPG (was: pgg-gpg doesn't work at all [fix included]) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:13:40 +0900 Message-ID: <54a15d860708310713k50f7c061nc40cefb80bb6a99a@mail.gmail.com> References: <06937cc5-86bc-4c13-9779-5b1acab5cc6d@well-done.deisui.org> <876448f20z.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <832a1fc1-35da-426c-a66b-f1b5f850ae92@well-done.deisui.org> <4e687c1c-a602-4248-a49f-535fa0372646@well-done.deisui.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1188569649 5542 80.91.229.12 (31 Aug 2007 14:14:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, "Miles Bader" To: "Reiner Steib" Original-X-From: ding-owner+M13631@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Aug 31 16:14:06 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IR7G3-0000tj-Gc for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:13:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IR7Fs-0002EN-KL; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:13:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IR7Fq-0002E4-O7 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:13:46 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IR7Fn-000228-M1 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:13:46 -0500 Original-Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.180]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1IR7Fm-0001Md-00 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:13:42 +0200 Original-Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f47so1545606pye for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:13:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=QVfMWrMexCphYeV0W8n51a7QlfAmh1GWOzY6RnAdL7kBg0C+CXqucrA21GUa1IF7ErNI3AQyDcimDt8LiBOAIjqTncXk1eiV7b9AccFRZqJFzasca1Z5Yau10uqQ6jj721fFTGKdjDzJ/eCpXBUzC0qQiOTRIPcZ2ApwAOF/9w4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=qBJuTsk0h6wai2TRMvLK9T+hkMwGrv1OVdpiXDGEbQcjr9Syy/bRdkln4Z6jgIdM+837wdaeC/gqjAYrgU93Je/gUrtAuF19WsrsPPcZaqguaXVb1i02QsMxA9TF6BD799XsH0TzzmR5susO3eAkAUnqALgWhscAS21MdqiX1r8= Original-Received: by 10.35.98.3 with SMTP id a3mr2033938pym.1188569620746; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:13:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.35.128.7 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:13:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: da893b4e1cc07f0c X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:65120 Archived-At: 2007/8/31, Reiner Steib : > I only signing or encryption quite rarely. I don't have installed > EasyPG yet, but I'd surely use it if it was installed with Gnus or > Emacs (currently I use the Emacs 22 branch + Gnus trunk). IMHO, if you are the "de facto Gnus maintainer" (as Miles said), it's time to try it to see if it works better (or worse) than PGG. I have no interest on your usage, but you seems to have just stated that "the packages included in Gnus (or Emacs) are good, otherwise they are bad" again and again. > > I don't want to import EasyPG to Gnus CVS. > > I don't want to do this against your will. However I still don't > understand you objections. I don't understand why you want to include it in Gnus CVS. I think the CVS is the place to be used for development rather than distribution. Is it not enough to include the EasyPG tarball into the Gnus tarball on release, or just to prepare a mirror of EasyPG on the Gnus distribution site? Regards, -- Daiki Ueno