From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/65591 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Daiki Ueno" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: encrypt.el in No Gnus 0.7 Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 10:16:50 +0900 Message-ID: <54a15d860711071716g76be1cc1iaa340dce27a54896@mail.gmail.com> References: <87zly3y4ru.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <54a15d860711071658j40e1af43r6be4fb0f44ece932@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1194484633 7929 80.91.229.12 (8 Nov 2007 01:17:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 01:17:13 +0000 (UTC) To: rms@gnu.org, ueno@unixuser.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, ding@gnus.org, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 08 02:17:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ipw1C-0001vO-3i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 02:17:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ipw10-000482-P2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ipw0w-00044q-KT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:16:58 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ipw0s-00042w-Kw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:16:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ipw0s-00042t-G7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:16:54 -0500 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.168]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ipw0s-0001va-5h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:16:54 -0500 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so271832ugf for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:16:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=1gd5uD31zwSRlJn5TkOFLKlD/B0kp7ykqSACrjSRZQk=; b=p/LBxqp04xy8ah6seANku3Y5GDcr7NeLfwlX6iMAs8K20+yYGy88tqhjAfhtNZV2vkjHy0GxwxID1qLPjgnIxAzEP6T6Y8r2e0RXc1C7EQpdWc5Z58t88G6rNUIr51ne0a9r2mLKBwj2hsGiZdLAUVnXfD5IkhVe8qo5CafFB8w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=g5hiPshem0ZR5nIx1DJonA7otD38sM2ig61pc/DYtdo9wh8JBOIWEZmtC0wnswJnR1KAE/tDbZwYHkcBkfhp6mVwqNFAo2BBBfPRU0Dxa6uOobh54r0HD7qU9al3Q/sDkmjjvbQVVHZarXdfEZi3c8TzQBf1Uuq+FUa1Kqm2R50= Original-Received: by 10.142.142.16 with SMTP id p16mr1583217wfd.1194484610409; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:16:50 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.142.241.4 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 17:16:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54a15d860711071658j40e1af43r6be4fb0f44ece932@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4a9487a606921661 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82782 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:65591 Archived-At: 2007/11/8, Daiki Ueno : > 2007/11/7, Ted Zlatanov : > > RS> Evidence of users actually wanting to use that sort of extension in > > RS> Emacs would convince me very quickly. > > > > So far Stefan Monnier, Reiner Steib, and I have said this is something > > we want. Daiki Ueno is the only one to have spoken against it. > > Excluding the package maintainers for each side, this is 2-0. Any more > > votes for either side? > > They really use encrypt.el and are saying that they want to use such > sort of extension? It seems not. Also, I'm not against that we have at least one builtin cipher. I just opposed that including a crap called encrypt.el. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno