From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4294 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dreschs@mpd.tandem.com (Sten Drescher) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [sgnus 0.18] gnus-summary-resend-message and mail-self-blind Date: 06 Dec 1995 11:57:24 -0600 Organization: Tandem Computers Sender: dreschs@mpd.tandem.com Message-ID: <55ybsqkrcr.fsf@galil.austnsc.tandem.com> References: <55vinvjjxa.fsf@galil.austnsc.tandem.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145060 29099 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:17:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:17:40 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id IAA21596 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 1995 08:38:45 -0800 Original-Received: from galil.austnsc.tandem.com (argyle.mpd.tandem.com [131.124.250.13]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 6 Dec 1995 18:55:57 +0100 Original-Received: (from dreschs@localhost) by galil.austnsc.tandem.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) id LAA17080; Wed, 6 Dec 1995 11:57:27 -0600 (CST) Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: davidk@lysator.liu.se's message of 05 Dec 1995 23:27:07 +0100 Original-Lines: 53 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4294 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4294 davidk@lysator.liu.se (David K}gedal) said: dreschs@mpd.tandem.com (Sten Drescher) writes: SD> I have mail-self-blind set, so that I get a BCC: to myself. Well, SD> when I use gnus-summary-resend-message, it ends up with a SD> Resent-BCC: field. I want the BCC: field either 1) left alone, or SD> 2) stripped off, since that's the whole point of _B_CC:. I'd prefer SD> the first, because with certain resends, it will result in the mail SD> also going to my other account, but I'll settle for the second. Any SD> ideas? DK> The patch I sent to the list earlier today takes care of not putting DK> Resent-BCC: in the mail. Actually, we may both be taking the wrong tack at this problem. >>From RFC 822: RFC822> 4.5. RECEIVER FIELDS RFC822> 4.5.1. TO / RESENT-TO RFC822> This field contains the identity of the primary recipients of RFC822> the message. RFC822> 4.5.2. CC / RESENT-CC RFC822> This field contains the identity of the secondary RFC822> (informational) recipients of the message. RFC822> 4.5.3. BCC / RESENT-BCC RFC822> This field contains the identity of additional recipients of the RFC822> message. The contents of this field are not included in copies RFC822> of the message sent to the primary and secondary recipients. RFC822> Some systems may choose to include the text of the "Bcc" field RFC822> only in the author(s)'s copy, while others may also include it RFC822> in the text sent to all those indicated in the "Bcc" list. Based on this, I think that Resent-BCC: is appropriate. Now what I'm not clear on is _what_ is responsible for handiling the destination - does Gnus/Emacs call sendmail with explicit delivery addresses, or does sendmail pick out the Resent- headers and use those? Looking at the sendmail guide for v8.7, it looks like sendmail _should_ be doing the work, but may not. Anyone more versed in SMTP implementation reading this? Sten -- #include /* Sten Drescher */ To get my PGP public key, send me email with your public key and Subject: PGP key exchange Key fingerprint = 90 5F 1D FD A6 7C 84 5E A9 D3 90 16 B2 44 C4 F3