X-Sent is incorrect

X-Sent is incorrect

[Ted Rathkopf]

I upgraded from pgnus 0.90 to 0.96 last night.  This morning I noticed 
that all of my X-Sent headers are 8 hours off.

The last message I received says this:
> Date: Wed Sep 22 11:50:52 1999 --400
> X-Sent: 8 hours, 8 minutes ago

But the date on my machine says this:

rathkopf@tick ~ 34 % date
Wed Sep 22 11:58:52 EDT 1999

Does anyone know where the 8 hour discrepancy is coming from?



-- 
Ted Rathkopf

Re: X-Sent is incorrect

[Colin Rafferty]

Ted Rathkopf writes:

> The last message I received says this:
>> Date: Wed Sep 22 11:50:52 1999 --400
>> X-Sent: 8 hours, 8 minutes ago

> But the date on my machine says this:

> Wed Sep 22 11:58:52 EDT 1999

Note that your time zone in your message is screwed up.

I would assume that Gnus is smart enough to recognize the double
negative, and assumes that it really means +400, which puts the mail
coming from somewhere in Asia.

Of course, noon in Asia was eight hours earlier than noon in New York
City.

-- 
Colin

Re: X-Sent is incorrect

[Ted Rathkopf]

Colin Rafferty <craffert@ms.com> writes:

> Ted Rathkopf writes:
> 
> > The last message I received says this:
> >> Date: Wed Sep 22 11:50:52 1999 --400
> >> X-Sent: 8 hours, 8 minutes ago
> 
> > But the date on my machine says this:
> 
> > Wed Sep 22 11:58:52 EDT 1999
> 
> Note that your time zone in your message is screwed up.
> 
> I would assume that Gnus is smart enough to recognize the double
> negative, and assumes that it really means +400, which puts the mail
> coming from somewhere in Asia.
> 
> Of course, noon in Asia was eight hours earlier than noon in New York
> City.

Makes sense, but this didn't happen before I upgraded from 0.90 to
0.96.  And it's not the fault of the sender, unless *your* time zone
is --400, too.



> From: Colin Rafferty <craffert@ms.com>
> Subject: Re: X-Sent is incorrect
> To: GNUS Mailing List <ding@gnus.org>
> Date: Wed Sep 22 15:33:37 1999 --400
> X-Sent: 8 hours, 21 minutes, 23 seconds ago


-- 
Ted Rathkopf

Re: X-Sent is incorrect

[Colin Rafferty]

Ted Rathkopf writes:
> Colin Rafferty <craffert@ms.com> writes:
>> Ted Rathkopf writes:

>> > The last message I received says this:
>> >> Date: Wed Sep 22 11:50:52 1999 --400
>> >> X-Sent: 8 hours, 8 minutes ago

>> Note that your time zone in your message is screwed up.

> Makes sense, but this didn't happen before I upgraded from 0.90 to
> 0.96.  And it's not the fault of the sender, unless *your* time zone
> is --400, too.

>> From: Colin Rafferty <craffert@ms.com>
>> Subject: Re: X-Sent is incorrect
>> To: GNUS Mailing List <ding@gnus.org>
>> Date: Wed Sep 22 15:33:37 1999 --400
>> X-Sent: 8 hours, 21 minutes, 23 seconds ago

In my mailbox, this is what my message said:

>> Date: 22 Sep 1999 15:33:37 -0400

Of course, I'm still in the stone age with 0.84.

If you do `C-u g' do you actually still have the --400?  Is it like
that in your Incoming file?

-- 
Colin

Re: X-Sent is incorrect

[Shenghuo ZHU]

>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Rathkopf <ted@rathkopf.org> writes:

Ted> Makes sense, but this didn't happen before I upgraded from 0.90 to
Ted> 0.96.  And it's not the fault of the sender, unless *your* time zone
Ted> is --400, too.

I believe my patch in Message-ID: <5bhfl28q2p.fsf@giga.cs.rochester.edu> 
fixed the --400 problem.

-- 
Shenghuo ZHU

Re: X-Sent is incorrect

[Ted Rathkopf]

Colin Rafferty <craffert@ms.com> writes:

> If you do `C-u g' do you actually still have the --400?  Is it like
> that in your Incoming file?

Nope.  Plain old -0400 there. 


-- 
Ted Rathkopf