From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/26024 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Shenghuo ZHU Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Peculiar treatment of edited messages Date: 24 Oct 1999 15:53:51 -0400 Organization: U of Rochester Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <5bwvsch6wg.fsf@giga.cs.rochester.edu> References: <87ln8yahw8.fsf@chow.mat.jhu.edu> <87yacs7gua.fsf@chow.mat.jhu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035163310 17244 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:21:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:21:50 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA10067 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 15:54:29 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAB21272; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 14:54:26 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 24 Oct 1999 14:54:39 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA06086 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 14:54:28 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from cayuga.cs.rochester.edu (cayuga.cs.rochester.edu [192.5.53.209]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA10061 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 15:53:54 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from giga.cs.rochester.edu (giga.cs.rochester.edu [192.5.53.186]) by cayuga.cs.rochester.edu (8.9.3/Q) with ESMTP id PAA04018 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 15:53:52 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from zsh@localhost) by giga.cs.rochester.edu (8.9.1b+Sun/Q++) id PAA08492; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 15:53:51 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: ZSH X-Face: 'IF:e51ib'Qbl^(}l^&4-J`'P!@[4~O|&k#:@Gld#b/]oMq&`&FVY._3+b`mzp~Jeve~/#/ ERD!OTe<86UhyN=l`mrPY)M7_}`Ktt\K+58Z!hu7>qU,i.N7TotU[FYE(f1;}`g2xj!u*l`^&=Q!g{ *q|ddto|nkt"$r,K$[)"|6,elPH= GJ6Q In-Reply-To: Dan Christensen's message of "Sun, 24 Oct 1999 14:29:17 -0400" Original-Lines: 54 User-Agent: Gnus/5.07009701 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.97.1) Emacs/20.4 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:26024 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:26024 >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Christensen writes: Dan> Dan Christensen writes: >> Ted Stern writes: >>> In Pgnus 0.96, Emacs 20.3, I sometimes lose my email after editing >>> my messages. That is, my cursor sits on a message description in >>> the *Summary* buffer, I hit 'e', and do some changes to the >>> article. When finished, I hit 'C-c C-c'. But then Gnus puts a [...] >> I've had similar things happen, although if I remember correctly >> the articles actually vanished from the nnfolder file as well, and >> I had to get them from the Incoming directory. Dan> This happened to me again today, so I can give a bit more info. Dan> I had point in the *Article* buffer when I hit `e'; not sure if Dan> that is relevant, but it might be. What happened is that the Dan> headers of the article in my nnfolder file got replaced by just Dan> the headers I have displayed in the *Article* buffer: [...] Dan> Note that the "From " line is incorrect, and the various other Dan> headers that Gnus makes use of (like X-Gnus-Mail-Source, Xref, Dan> and X-Gnus-Article-Number) are all missing. So as far as Gnus Dan> can tell this article doesn't exist. Right. Hitting `e' in *Article* buffer causes this problem. Besides, it will not decode MIME either. Different functions are called for hitting `e' in *Article* buffer and *Summary* buffer. Therefore, I am wondering whether we should remove function `gnus-article-edit' and use `gnus-summary-edit-article' instead. As a hot-fix, evaluating the following lines may help. (gnus-define-keys gnus-article-mode-map "e" gnus-article-read-summary-keys) I am not sure what caused Ted's bug. Maybe the separating blank line. To bring back those missing articles, I tried to move all articles in the group to a temporary group, then rescan the group, and repeat until no articles show in the group. It was long time ago. I also am not sure whether it works for Ted's situation. -- Shenghuo ZHU