From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/29671 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jsbien@mimuw.edu.pl (Janusz S. Bien) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Gnus 5.8.3, NT Emacs and nndoc Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 09:18:02 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <62w44sdXbyWK091yn@mimuw.edu.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035166303 4034 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:11:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E71D051E for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 02:26:07 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAB19989; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 01:25:57 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 30 Mar 2000 01:25:07 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA10059 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 01:24:59 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from duch.mimuw.edu.pl (duch.mimuw.edu.pl [193.0.96.2]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 53AAAD051E for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 02:24:33 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (qmail 4905 invoked by uid 1009); 30 Mar 2000 07:22:48 -0000 Original-To: ntemacs-users@cs.washington.edu Original-Lines: 32 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:29671 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:29671 When I enter the *Gnus edit form* buffer for a nndoc group with Gnus Edit Info or a similar command and I leave the buffer with `C-c C-c' without changing anything, the group is killed and a new group is created with a strange name. On Linux the command behaves as expected. Mu guess is that Gnus is mishandling the drive letter, which always appears in the name of the nndoc group. I can live with this, but it would be good to make sure there are no harmful consequences of this problem. Best regards Janusz --------------------------------------------------------------------- , dr hab. Janusz S. Bien, prof. UW Prof. Janusz S. Bien, Warsaw Uniwersity --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Na tym koncie czytam i wysylam poczte i wiadomosci offline - prosze nie oczekiwac szybkiej odpowiedzi! Data w naglowku to data rozpoczecia pisania listu, a nie jego wyslania. --------------------------------------------------------------------- On this account I read/post mail/news offline - do not expect an immediate answer! The date in the header refers to the moment when I started to write the letter, not to the moment when I sent it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------