From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/75627 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: emacs 24 and gnus Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 15:43:15 +0100 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: <6daajaw324.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> References: <8762u5c5iv.fsf@member.fsf.org> <87fwt8j4zn.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294584215 5755 80.91.229.12 (9 Jan 2011 14:43:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 14:43:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Tommy Kelly Original-X-From: ding-owner+M23978@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Jan 09 15:43:31 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PbwUU-0007df-GB for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 15:43:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PbwUN-00041K-K8; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 08:43:23 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PbwUL-000414-R7 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 08:43:21 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PbwUK-0003QL-8A for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 08:43:21 -0600 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PbwUJ-0008Fq-BK for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 15:43:19 +0100 Original-Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so16811067bwz.17 for ; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 06:43:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject :organization:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=w5+O3cgynlstWILm7CQkEett5EbMwswX9Kf/RNGDlNQ=; b=OusA+bjPyCtPGUnyODNzEEIRQ2vdV9E6E0JR1dJAPPH5EYQEL0+/4SOSIkaeh0nE9G lUU/JQ1bOVNPZrAgdKOk0OE1DeRnf9+pKnKJkRJMu73NCjiPEsmH22/nVzouOHLXiN1z 22nFb4PbQdZI1+htpY7V8kJgDPqz/R+HOb6SY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=UQorGyC7YDWliCw44YYhudreZf/rOYLXoSqEBYFoZ/B7w5aml6axeOoPAUCxK10am4 ucQq9Uc2qVSjOtSviWdsolfc0JGhekho1hizUFNOi1X66yg0uLn2KPj+C4WVUky0HhpI 3kcuuSbxoMT/PTZMmZ7wXt0l93h59LY5R4RxI= Original-Received: by 10.204.85.26 with SMTP id m26mr648583bkl.137.1294584198560; Sun, 09 Jan 2011 06:43:18 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([85.183.18.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x38sm13868776bkj.13.2011.01.09.06.43.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 09 Jan 2011 06:43:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Tommy Kelly's message of "Sun, 09 Jan 2011 08:10:19 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:75627 Archived-At: Tommy Kelly writes: > Richard Riley writes: > >> That is true, but I think I probably stick with the released Gnus at >> some point ( if I ever get my spam-split working again - I still havent >> see a working one with nnmail and nnimap split settings) as I had a few >> bad experiences with losing email in the last mad development phase >> which saw the brilliant IMAP improvements. > > I concur. The excellent IMAP speed improvements aren't enough to > compensate for my inability to get fancy splitting working (although > that's not a new-versus-old-gnus issue -- just a > fancy-split-is-hard-to-get-working one). While I was spending time > wrestling with lisp, my email backlog grew to over 500 messages. And > then it grew further, to almost 1000, when at one point Gnus decided to > mark all my messages as read and I had no choice but to unmark enough > back in time so as to be sure I caught everything I hadn't yet > handled! I have posted my set up a few times now and its still not working and I still havent seen a working set up. Is it really the case that no one else is using imap with spam-split? > > Given that one of the reasons I moved to gnus was because of its support > for org-mode and org-mode itself is hard enough to learn, I'm > temporarily (I hope) having to revert to gmail via a browser (cue sound > of chicken clucking :-) ), at least until such times as I've gotten my > arms around org and can maybe have another crack at fancy splitting. Or do what I do : mark the mail with imap labels using gmail filters : they correspond to your gnus folders. Despite splitting being a bit complicated and not working in my case, Gnus is still the numero uno mail reader ;)