From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8678 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Roderick Schertler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: insert signature after message-send-and-exit Date: Fri, 08 Nov 1996 21:01:03 -0500 Sender: roderick@ibcinc.com Message-ID: <7310.847504863@eeyore.ibcinc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148811 13674 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:20:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 4826 invoked from smtpd); 9 Nov 1996 02:13:30 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 9 Nov 1996 02:13:30 -0000 Original-Received: from relay2.smtp.psi.net (relay2.smtp.psi.net [38.8.188.2]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sat, 9 Nov 1996 03:02:53 +0100 Original-Received: from uu6.psi.com by relay2.smtp.psi.net (8.6.12/SMI-5.4-PSI) id VAA05316; Fri, 8 Nov 1996 21:02:51 -0500 Original-Received: by uu6.psi.com (5.65b/4.0.071791-PSI/PSINet) via UUCP; id AA05770 for ding@ifi.uio.no; Fri, 8 Nov 96 21:02:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eeyore.ibcinc.com with ESMTP by junior.ibcinc.com (8.6.13/IBC-1.31-locked) id VAA25952 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 1996 21:01:20 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost with SMTP by eeyore.ibcinc.com (8.6.13/IBC-s-1.4-locked) id CAA07311 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 1996 02:01:03 GMT Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8678 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8678 I like to edit messages without my signature in the buffer and then to have Gnus insert the signature behind the scenes after I type \C-c \C-c. I can't see that message mode can be made to do this simply, but I suspect I am missing something. (This is the default behavior on other news readers, so it seems weird that few Gnus users would want message mode to work this way.) If I'm not missing something and the idea isn't repugnant I'd be happy to supply code to provide this behavior based on a variable's setting. -- Roderick Schertler roderick@gate.net