From: Jake Colman <colman@ppllc.com>
Subject: spam/ham processing
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 20:50:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <764qxr3356.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> (raw)
I am getting a bit confused, although I think that I am almost there.
1) If a folder is declared a spam folder, and I set up a spam exit processor,
the contents of that folder will be sent to spam processor so that it can
be trained as spam. Eventually, in an ideal world, I would expect all
those messages to go directly to my general spambox as soon as they are
seen, since my processor has been trained, and not even hit this folder.
Is this correct?
2) In a spam folder, the default mark is the spam mark. How do I mark
sonmething as ham? When I exit the folder, if I have specified both hm
and spam exit processors, will both kinds of message be sent out to be
trained?
3) In a spam folder, the default action is to expire the spam contents. What
is the default action for the ham?
4) My spambox has the following configuration
((uidvalidity . "71437")
(timestamp 16288 15245)
(total-expire . t)
(spam-contents gnus-group-spam-classification-spam)
(spam-process
(gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-bogofilter gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-bogofilter))
(ham-process-destination . "nnimap+hamilton:INBOX/Misc")
(ham-marks
(gnus-read-mark))
(expiry-wait . immediate))
If I mark something in there as ham, by pressing 'd' and changing the mark
to 'r', it should be moved to Misc box. Instead, it disappared. How do I
figure out what happned to it?
5) I guess all groups should speicy both a ham and spam exit processor, no?
This way all group's contents can be used for training. The default
classification for the folder (ham/spam) should reflect the status of the
majortity of the mesages sent to that folder. Does this make sense?
TIA!
...Jake
--
Jake Colman
Principia Partners LLC Phone: (201) 209-2467
Harborside Financial Center Fax: (201) 946-0320
902 Plaza Two E-mail: colman@ppllc.com
Jersey City, NJ 07311 www.principiapartners.com
next reply other threads:[~2003-10-30 1:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-30 1:50 Jake Colman [this message]
2003-10-30 15:33 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-10-30 17:13 ` Jake Colman
2003-10-31 14:00 ` can gnus-unread-mark be a ham mark? Bill White
2003-10-31 16:47 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-10-31 17:09 ` Bill White
2003-10-31 17:35 ` Jake Colman
2003-10-31 17:52 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-10-31 17:53 ` Bill White
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=764qxr3356.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com \
--to=colman@ppllc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).