From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/54538 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jake Colman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: spam/ham processing Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 20:50:13 -0500 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <764qxr3356.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1067478666 1957 80.91.224.253 (30 Oct 2003 01:51:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 01:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3079@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Oct 30 02:51:04 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AF1xn-0005Rv-00 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 02:51:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AF1x6-0005p5-00; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:50:20 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AF1x1-0005p0-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:50:15 -0600 Original-Received: from newjersey.ppllc.com (unknown [65.206.49.195]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E2B3A005D for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:50:14 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (from colman@localhost) by newjersey.ppllc.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA11258; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 20:50:13 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: newjersey.ppllc.com: colman set sender to colman@ppllc.com using -f Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Jake X-URL: http://www.ppllc.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, usg-unix-v) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54538 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54538 I am getting a bit confused, although I think that I am almost there. 1) If a folder is declared a spam folder, and I set up a spam exit processor, the contents of that folder will be sent to spam processor so that it can be trained as spam. Eventually, in an ideal world, I would expect all those messages to go directly to my general spambox as soon as they are seen, since my processor has been trained, and not even hit this folder. Is this correct? 2) In a spam folder, the default mark is the spam mark. How do I mark sonmething as ham? When I exit the folder, if I have specified both hm and spam exit processors, will both kinds of message be sent out to be trained? 3) In a spam folder, the default action is to expire the spam contents. What is the default action for the ham? 4) My spambox has the following configuration ((uidvalidity . "71437") (timestamp 16288 15245) (total-expire . t) (spam-contents gnus-group-spam-classification-spam) (spam-process (gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-bogofilter gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-bogofilter)) (ham-process-destination . "nnimap+hamilton:INBOX/Misc") (ham-marks (gnus-read-mark)) (expiry-wait . immediate)) If I mark something in there as ham, by pressing 'd' and changing the mark to 'r', it should be moved to Misc box. Instead, it disappared. How do I figure out what happned to it? 5) I guess all groups should speicy both a ham and spam exit processor, no? This way all group's contents can be used for training. The default classification for the folder (ham/spam) should reflect the status of the majortity of the mesages sent to that folder. Does this make sense? TIA! ...Jake -- Jake Colman Principia Partners LLC Phone: (201) 209-2467 Harborside Financial Center Fax: (201) 946-0320 902 Plaza Two E-mail: colman@ppllc.com Jersey City, NJ 07311 www.principiapartners.com