From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/54667 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jake Colman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam/ham exit processors Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 10:08:25 -0500 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <76ad7crx1y.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> References: <76ekwpy35x.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> <4nllqx47mx.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <87ptg9ryb2.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> <4nptg916wn.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1067958603 21569 80.91.224.253 (4 Nov 2003 15:10:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 15:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3208@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Nov 04 16:10:01 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AH2oi-0007nM-00 for ; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:10:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AH2nQ-0000zS-00; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 09:08:40 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AH2nI-0000zG-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 09:08:32 -0600 Original-Received: from newjersey.ppllc.com (unknown [65.206.49.195]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332043A004F for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 09:08:31 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (from colman@localhost) by newjersey.ppllc.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA00752; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:08:25 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: newjersey.ppllc.com: colman set sender to colman@ppllc.com using -f Original-To: Kai Grossjohann X-Attribution: Jake X-URL: http://www.ppllc.com In-Reply-To: <4nptg916wn.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Mon, 03 Nov 2003 16:25:28 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, usg-unix-v) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54667 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54667 >>>>> "TZ" == Ted Zlatanov writes: TZ> Sure, you could have spam moved from all groups to "nnml:spam" [1] and TZ> then process spam only in "nnml:spam". I do that, and furthermore I TZ> have the spam-process-destination parameter of "nnml:spam" set to TZ> "nnml:train" so I can run SpamAssassin directly on the "nnml:spam" TZ> group's file contents. In "nnml:spam" I have the TZ> ham-process-destination set to "nnml:mail" and thus when I tick an TZ> article in the spam group it gets popped and ham-processed back into TZ> "nnml:mail". It's a pretty tidy system. But if spam training is done on all marked spam regardless of the group's classificiation, assuming I read the docs correctly, then why bother moving the spam anywhere else for processing? Why not just specify a spam exit processor on your ham-classified or unclassified group and let the spam get trained that way? Am I missing some benefit by not moving my spam into a spam-classified group? -- Jake Colman Principia Partners LLC Phone: (201) 209-2467 Harborside Financial Center Fax: (201) 946-0320 902 Plaza Two E-mail: colman@ppllc.com Jersey City, NJ 07311 www.principiapartners.com