From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/66272 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jake Colman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Problems with gnus-registry Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:42:10 -0500 Message-ID: <76bq6sai3x.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> References: <76sl0vma5q.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86k5loxulw.fsf@lifelogs.com> <76tzkoq1t4.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <868x20wi2a.fsf@lifelogs.com> <76y7a0nyo3.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86lk60uwwq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <764pconmz4.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86abmfv3ig.fsf@lifelogs.com> <767ihjm5qn.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86myqfoxrv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <76y79zkpnx.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <868x1yp3lr.fsf@lifelogs.com> <76wspic9eq.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <8663x2at4h.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202399007 12103 80.91.229.12 (7 Feb 2008 15:43:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:43:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ding Mailing List To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: ding-owner+M14763@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Feb 07 16:43:48 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JN8ui-0001Bz-DQ for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:43:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JN8to-00066j-9K; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:42:52 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JN8tm-00066N-Re for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:42:50 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JN8tg-0007yz-AY for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:42:50 -0600 Original-Received: from hamilton.ppllc.com ([69.7.239.36]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1JN8tj-0004Vd-00 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:42:47 +0100 Original-Received: from dev-d01.ppllc.com ([10.10.9.130]) by hamilton.ppllc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id ZN9MWAAT; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:43:10 -0500 X-Attribution: Jake X-URL: http://www.ppllc.com In-Reply-To: <8663x2at4h.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:31:58 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.17 (usg-unix-v) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:66272 Archived-At: >>>>> "TZ" == Ted Zlatanov writes: TZ> Gnus v5.10.8 is not up to date with all my changes lately. I'd TZ> suggest using a CVS checkout if possible; you can try updating just TZ> gnus-registry.el but it may break badly as the registry gets TZ> integrated more into Gnus as a whole. I will look into this. Right now it looks like my unix box cannot connect to cvs.gnus.org. :-( Are the nightly builds reasonably safe to check out? It does not look like this is any official build that is newer than v5.10.8, is there? I am looking into using match by subject since that it is one header that should always be there. Ufortunately, the message included below (I am showing all available headers) did not get registered and filed correctly even though I think it should have matched by subject. (BTW I am pretty sure that the embedded space in the subject is not the issue). ========================================================== Received: by hamilton.ppllc.com id <01C868E5.2C6CB3A0@hamilton.ppllc.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:24:48 -0500 Message-ID: <0B72769B5EA61E45BFDAB9B849923FE703359AC5@hamilton.ppllc.com> From: Andrew Vickers To: Jacob Colman Cc: Chirag Patel Subject: RE: PM-331 Asset Position Updates into VM FS - ready for tech rev iew Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:24:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain ========================================================== Looking into the registry, the message is registered correctly. But if I execute (message-fetch-field "subject") on this message, I get the following: "RE: PM-331 Asset Position Updates into VM FS - ready for tech rev iew, Re: PM-331 Asset Position Updates into VM FS - ready for tech" This looks like it duplicates the text in the subject header which, of course, will not match that which is registered. Is this a bug in the v5.10.8 version of the registry? ...Jake -- Jake Colman Director of Software Development Principia Partners LLC 101 West Elm Street Suite 620 Conshohocken, PA 19428 +1 (610) 755-9786 www.principiapartners.com