From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/54817 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jake Colman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus-registry question Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:25:28 -0500 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <76fzgrnktz.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> References: <76oevhjmde.fsf@newjersey.ppllc.com> <4nu159kzuc.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1068816343 26979 80.91.224.253 (14 Nov 2003 13:25:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 13:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3357@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Nov 14 14:25:40 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AKdxE-0006xD-00 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 14:25:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AKdx8-0001C6-00; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:25:34 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AKdx3-0001C1-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:25:29 -0600 Original-Received: from newjersey.ppllc.com (unknown [65.206.49.195]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF473A0027 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:25:29 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (from colman@localhost) by newjersey.ppllc.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA13858; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:25:28 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: newjersey.ppllc.com: colman set sender to colman@ppllc.com using -f Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Jake X-URL: http://www.ppllc.com In-Reply-To: <4nu159kzuc.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:04:59 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, usg-unix-v) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54817 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54817 >>>>> "TZ" == Ted Zlatanov writes: TZ> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, colman@ppllc.com wrote: >> How about if I send an email to someone and gcc it to a folder. >> Will the registry note that my outgoing email was filed somewhere >> and automatically file the reply? I'm not sure this works. Under >> this situation, I make sure to explitly read the gcc'ed email that I >> just sent in order to make dure that the registry takes note. When >> I do this, the reply is file correctly. Otherwise, I think not. TZ> The registry catches spooling, moving, copying, and deletion of TZ> messages. You can always check manually if it did what it should TZ> have by raising the value of the gnus-verbose variable (10 is good, TZ> albeit temporarily). In the Messages buffer, you'll see the TZ> registry's messages. >> What about if I reply to an email and then manually move that email >> to another folder. I know that the registry will take note of the >> move. But the reply to the email I sent is a follow-up to _my_ new >> message, not to the email that I moved. Will the registry track >> that? Is my question making sense? TZ> The registry will catch the first reference it can track. So, if the TZ> message that's incoming has references A and B, and A is in group P TZ> but B in group Q, then A wins (I'm pretty sure the references are TZ> checked in the expected order). TZ> Again, look at the Messages buffer to be sure, but I'm pretty sure TZ> that's what will happen, and it's what my testing has shown. As you TZ> know, the gnus-registry is not stable, so any bugs or quirks you TZ> uncover are greatly appreciated. I did find a situation where it is broken. I have a folder where the gcc is set to archive the message into the same folder. I used 'C-u a' to send a message using that folder's attributes. I made a point of NOT opening that folder again. When I next split my mail after I had received a reply the reply message did NOT get filed correctly. I then moved the reply message back to my INBOX and tried again. This time, too, it was misfiled. I again copied the message back to my INBOX. This time, however, I opened up the folder where my initial emial was filed and read that email. This registered my original with the registry. When I now tried splitting, the reply was filed correctly. -- Jake Colman Principia Partners LLC Phone: (201) 209-2467 Harborside Financial Center Fax: (201) 946-0320 902 Plaza Two E-mail: colman@ppllc.com Jersey City, NJ 07311 www.principiapartners.com