From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/66320 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jake Colman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: registry subject tracking problem Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:01:56 -0500 Message-ID: <76pruygchn.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> References: <76prv7v394.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <86tzka3rcs.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203109388 21670 80.91.229.12 (15 Feb 2008 21:03:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:03:08 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M14811@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Feb 15 22:03:32 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JQ7iU-0004jI-0F for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:03:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JQ7he-0002GJ-Ax; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:02:38 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JQ7hc-0002G1-Hj for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:02:36 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JQ7hW-0000fI-6e for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:02:36 -0600 Original-Received: from hamilton.ppllc.com ([69.7.239.36]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1JQ7ha-0005Zs-00 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:02:34 +0100 Original-Received: from dev-d01.ppllc.com ([10.10.9.130]) by hamilton.ppllc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id ZN9MWNHS; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:02:59 -0500 X-Attribution: Jake X-URL: http://www.ppllc.com In-Reply-To: <86tzka3rcs.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:19:15 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) XEmacs/21.4.17 (usg-unix-v, no MULE) X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:66320 Archived-At: >>>>> "TZ" == Ted Zlatanov writes: TZ> On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:09:43 -0500 Jake Colman wrote: Jake> The initial message's headers are as follows: Jake> Subject: Build Issue with XRT Licensing Jake> I find the following entry is .gnus.registry.eld: Jake> ("<76zluc8sqv.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com>" ((mtime 18347 34824 532917) Jake> (sender . "Jake Colman ") (subject . "Build Issue Jake> with XRT Licensing")) "INBOX/Principia/IS_Issues") Jake> The email sent in reply, has the following headers: Jake> Subject: RE: Build Issue with XRT Licensing Jake> I manually moved this email where I had hoped the registry would file Jake> it. I now find the following entry in .gnus.registry.eld (which, Jake> incidentally, appears earlier in the list than the first one): Jake> ("<0B72769B5EA61E45BFDAB9B849923FE703359C09@hamilton.ppllc.com>" Jake> ((mtime 18348 30274 550938) (sender . "Mark Vosteen Jake> ") (subject . "Build Issue with XRT Licensing")) Jake> "INBOX/Principia/IS_Issues") Jake> The problem is that if I execute (message-fetch-field "subject") on Jake> these two messages, I get different results. Jake> For the first message I get: Jake> "Build Issue with XRT Licensing" Jake> For the second message I get: Jake> "RE: Build Issue with XRT Licensing, Build Issue with XRT Licensing" TZ> Strange, I get only the original subject (with RE:, but that's removed TZ> in the registry by gnus-simplify-subject). I don't know why the subject TZ> is not retrieved properly from the second e-mail. You must have called TZ> message-fetch-field in a strange context. TZ> In any case, note that the subject was extracted properly for the second TZ> message since the registry entry has the right subject. So from now on, TZ> messages with that subject should go to "INBOX/Principia/IS_Issues". TZ> Can you grep the registry file for "Build Issue with XRT Licensing" and TZ> see if it shows up in any other groups? That would be a reason why the TZ> followup didn't go to the right place. TZ> I'll do the logging improvements we discussed earlier. Sorry for the TZ> delay, but I've been too busy with a new baby :) TZ> Ted Ted, I grepped the registry and all relevant entries contain the correct subject and the correct target group. And I agree that the registry got it right yet it didn't trace it correct anyway! Let me know when the new logging improvements are ready and I'll try them out. For my purposes, since so many messages don't get filed correctly, a debug option that shows me what you know about the message and how you traced it would be very helpful. Thanks. ...Jake P.S. Congrats on the new baby. We have 6 of our own! -- Jake Colman Director of Software Development Principia Partners LLC 101 West Elm Street Suite 620 Conshohocken, PA 19428 +1 (610) 755-9786 www.principiapartners.com