From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/66281 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jake Colman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: registry subject tracking problem Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:09:43 -0500 Message-ID: <76prv7v394.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202487090 27145 80.91.229.12 (8 Feb 2008 16:11:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 16:11:30 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M14772@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Feb 08 17:11:51 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JNVpO-0006sx-Oc for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:11:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JNVo2-0006FU-Ur; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:10:27 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JNVo1-0006F2-4o for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:10:25 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JNVnu-00048m-Gk for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:10:25 -0600 Original-Received: from hamilton.ppllc.com ([69.7.239.36]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1JNVnx-0001nu-00 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:10:22 +0100 Original-Received: from dev-d01.ppllc.com ([10.10.9.130]) by hamilton.ppllc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id ZN9MWCAM; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:10:42 -0500 X-Attribution: Jake X-URL: http://www.ppllc.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) XEmacs/21.4.17 (usg-unix-v, no MULE) X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:66281 Archived-At: I've referenced this problem already elsewhere but it was buried inside of a much larger thread. I'm raising it again in its own thread and providing more data. I just upgraded to No Gnus 0.7 so I am using the latest code as of this week. I sent an email from a folder with gcc-self specified. I received a reply to that email but the reply was not filed correctly by the registry. Ted has already help me determine that the emails that I am getting are missing the typical headers used by the registry (they are coming through an old version MS Exchange Server which is probably stripping the headers) which is why I need to work harder to get the message traced properly. So I have turned on the registry's extra tracking by subject. The initial message's headers are as follows: =========================================================== To: is@ppllc.com Subject: Build Issue with XRT Licensing X-Attribution: Jake X-URL: http://www.ppllc.com X-Draft-From: ("nnimap+hamilton:INBOX/Principia/IS_Issues" "") From: Jake Colman Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:35:20 -0500 Message-ID: <76zluc8sqv.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.17 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii =========================================================== I find the following entry is .gnus.registry.eld: ("<76zluc8sqv.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com>" ((mtime 18347 34824 532917) (sender . "Jake Colman ") (subject . "Build Issue with XRT Licensing")) "INBOX/Principia/IS_Issues") The email sent in reply, has the following headers: =========================================================== Received: by hamilton.ppllc.com id <01C86A60.3AF26D30@hamilton.ppllc.com>; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:38:11 -0500 Message-ID: <0B72769B5EA61E45BFDAB9B849923FE703359C09@hamilton.ppllc.com> From: Mark Vosteen To: Jacob Colman Subject: RE: Build Issue with XRT Licensing Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:38:11 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain =========================================================== I manually moved this email where I had hoped the registry would file it. I now find the following entry in .gnus.registry.eld (which, incidentally, appears earlier in the list than the first one): ("<0B72769B5EA61E45BFDAB9B849923FE703359C09@hamilton.ppllc.com>" ((mtime 18348 30274 550938) (sender . "Mark Vosteen ") (subject . "Build Issue with XRT Licensing")) "INBOX/Principia/IS_Issues") The problem is that if I execute (message-fetch-field "subject") on these two messages, I get different results. For the first message I get: "Build Issue with XRT Licensing" For the second message I get: "RE: Build Issue with XRT Licensing, Build Issue with XRT Licensing" Would this discrepency explain why my message did not get filed correctly? TIA! ...Jake -- Jake Colman Director of Software Development Principia Partners LLC 101 West Elm Street Suite 620 Conshohocken, PA 19428 +1 (610) 755-9786 www.principiapartners.com