From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/66695 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jake Colman Newsgroups: gmane.discuss,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Slow Access from Gnus Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:03:25 -0400 Organization: Principia Partners LLC Message-ID: <76r6dieu8i.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> References: <76abkahc6i.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <87r6dmobkp.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <76sky2fksc.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <877ifdhip3.fsf@dod.no> <76d4p5g22s.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <764pahfsdj.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> <76ve2xe8ep.fsf@dev-d01.ppllc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1207505031 15391 80.91.229.12 (6 Apr 2008 18:03:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 18:03:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: gmane-discuss@hawk.netfonds.no Original-X-From: gmane-discuss-bounces@hawk.netfonds.no Sun Apr 06 20:04:23 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gd-gmane-discuss@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from hawk.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.246]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JiZE6-00015P-RT for gd-gmane-discuss@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Apr 2008 20:04:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=hawk.netfonds.no) by hawk.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1JiZDd-0002mt-00; Sun, 06 Apr 2008 20:03:53 +0200 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by hawk.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1JiZDb-0002mo-00 for ; Sun, 06 Apr 2008 20:03:51 +0200 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JiZDN-0006Yh-Jj for gmane-discuss@hawk.netfonds.no; Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:03:37 +0000 Original-Received: from 69.7.239.34 ([69.7.239.34]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:03:37 +0000 Original-Received: from colman by 69.7.239.34 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:03:37 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 26 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.7.239.34 X-Attribution: Jake X-URL: http://www.principiapartners.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) XEmacs/21.4.17 (usg-unix-v, no MULE) Cancel-Lock: sha1:OnUv/4VM7jDRhUGpwIcD5uDA70c= X-BeenThere: gmane-discuss@hawk.netfonds.no X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: gmane-discuss.hawk.netfonds.no List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: gmane-discuss-bounces@hawk.netfonds.no Errors-To: gmane-discuss-bounces@hawk.netfonds.no Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.discuss:11615 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:66695 Archived-At: >>>>> "RS" == Reiner Steib writes: RS> On Fri, Apr 04 2008, Jake Colman wrote: >> WOW! What a difference! My prior setting for >> 'gnus-fetch-old-headers' was t. I set it to 500 and I now enter >> the group virtually instantaneously. Is there any practical >> downside to specifying a number instead of 't'? RS> You might not see old posting in the threads... Is there a way to set the gnus-fetch-old-headers variable one way for gmane groups and another way for standard nntp groups. (those which expire their articles)? Maybe some sort of pre- and post-hook? -- Jake Colman Director of Software Development Principia Partners LLC 101 West Elm Street Suite 620 Conshohocken, PA 19428 +1 (610) 755-9786 www.principiapartners.com