* nnmail-cache-ignore-groups question
@ 2004-04-13 9:40 Hiroshi Fujishima
2004-04-13 11:26 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Hiroshi Fujishima @ 2004-04-13 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi,
I am using Gnus with follwing setting.
gnus-select-method's value is (nnml "")
gnus-message-archive-method's value is "archive" <- which is default value
gnus-message-archive-group's value is "backup"
If I post a message to mailing list, the message which is delivered
from mailing list server has Gnus-Warning: field as below. Because,
the posted message Gcc-ed in nnfolder+archive:backup.
Gnus-Warning: This is a duplicate of message <7cptad9pid.fsf@nature.tsukuba.ac.jp>
Since I don't like Gnus records Gcc-ed message in
nnfolder+archive:backup, I refer info as below.
(info "(gnus)Fancy Mail Splitting")
| Also see the variable `nnmail-cache-ignore-groups' if you don't want
| certain groups to be recorded in the cache. For example, if all
| outgoing messages are written to an "outgoing" group, you could set
| `nnmail-cache-ignore-groups' to match that group name. Otherwise,
| answers to all your messages would end up in the "outgoing" group.
So I add next configuration, but Gnus still recording message in
nnfolder+archive:backup. why?
(setq nnmail-cache-ignore-groups "^nnfolder\\+archive:backup$")
--
/\ /\
(^.^)
(")")
*This is the cute kitty virus, please copy this into your sig so it can spread.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: nnmail-cache-ignore-groups question
2004-04-13 9:40 nnmail-cache-ignore-groups question Hiroshi Fujishima
@ 2004-04-13 11:26 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-04-14 6:59 ` Kai Grossjohann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Katsumi Yamaoka @ 2004-04-13 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1802 bytes --]
>>>>> In <7cfzb8qkqn.fsf@nature.tsukuba.ac.jp> Hiroshi Fujishima wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using Gnus with follwing setting.
> gnus-select-method's value is (nnml "")
> gnus-message-archive-method's value is "archive" <- which is default value
> gnus-message-archive-group's value is "backup"
> If I post a message to mailing list, the message which is delivered
> grom mailing list server has Gnus-Warning: field as below. Because,
> the posted message Gcc-ed in nnfolder+archive:backup.
> Gnus-Warning: This is a duplicate of message <7cptad9pid.fsf@nature.tsukuba.ac.jp>
It is because those message-ids have been stored in the
nnmail-message-id-cache-file. I think it is useless to cache
ids for archive articles. If it is true, the problem will be
able to be solved by some way (currently I don't have a concrete
idea).
> Since I don't like Gnus records Gcc-ed message in
> nnfolder+archive:backup, I refer info as below.
> (info "(gnus)Fancy Mail Splitting")
>| Also see the variable `nnmail-cache-ignore-groups' if you don't want
>| certain groups to be recorded in the cache. For example, if all
>| outgoing messages are written to an "outgoing" group, you could set
>| `nnmail-cache-ignore-groups' to match that group name. Otherwise,
>| answers to all your messages would end up in the "outgoing" group.
> So I add next configuration, but Gnus still recording message in
> nnfolder+archive:backup. why?
> (setq nnmail-cache-ignore-groups "^nnfolder\\+archive:backup$")
Because nnfolder is not your primary mail back end which is not
examined by nnmail-cache-ignore-groups. See nnmail-cache-insert.
Isn't it a bug? I don't understand why it puts non-primary mail
back ends out. Although I have no confidence, I made a patch for
it. I appreciate someone examining it closely.
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/x-patch, Size: 844 bytes --]
--- nnmail.el~ 2004-03-05 10:50:21 +0000
+++ nnmail.el 2004-04-13 11:25:16 +0000
@@ -1570,15 +1570,16 @@
(save-excursion
(set-buffer nnmail-cache-buffer)
(goto-char (point-max))
- (if (and grp (not (string= "" grp))
- (gnus-methods-equal-p gnus-command-method
- (nnmail-cache-primary-mail-backend)))
+ (if (and grp (not (string= "" grp)))
(let ((regexp (if (consp nnmail-cache-ignore-groups)
(mapconcat 'identity nnmail-cache-ignore-groups
"\\|")
nnmail-cache-ignore-groups)))
(unless (and regexp (string-match regexp grp))
- (insert id "\t" grp "\n")))
+ (if (gnus-methods-equal-p gnus-command-method
+ (nnmail-cache-primary-mail-backend))
+ (insert id "\t" grp "\n")
+ (insert id "\n"))))
(insert id "\n"))))))
(defun nnmail-cache-primary-mail-backend ()
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: nnmail-cache-ignore-groups question
2004-04-13 11:26 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
@ 2004-04-14 6:59 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-04-14 7:25 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kai Grossjohann @ 2004-04-14 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> writes:
> Because nnfolder is not your primary mail back end which is not
> examined by nnmail-cache-ignore-groups. See nnmail-cache-insert.
> Isn't it a bug? I don't understand why it puts non-primary mail
> back ends out. Although I have no confidence, I made a patch for
> it. I appreciate someone examining it closely.
Looking good, IMHO.
Kai
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: nnmail-cache-ignore-groups question
2004-04-14 6:59 ` Kai Grossjohann
@ 2004-04-14 7:25 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-04-15 4:35 ` Hiroshi Fujishima
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Katsumi Yamaoka @ 2004-04-14 7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
>>>>> In <87r7ur9ha5.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de>
>>>>> Kai Grossjohann <kai@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> wrote:
> Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> writes:
>> Because nnfolder is not your primary mail back end which is not
>> examined by nnmail-cache-ignore-groups. See nnmail-cache-insert.
>> Isn't it a bug? I don't understand why it puts non-primary mail
>> back ends out. Although I have no confidence, I made a patch for
>> it. I appreciate someone examining it closely.
> Looking good, IMHO.
> Kai
Thanks! I also got to have confidence that it should be fixed.
Fujishima-san, how about the Gnus CVS head?
--
Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: nnmail-cache-ignore-groups question
2004-04-14 7:25 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
@ 2004-04-15 4:35 ` Hiroshi Fujishima
2004-04-15 6:43 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Hiroshi Fujishima @ 2004-04-15 4:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
>>>>> In <b9ysmf7c972.fsf@jpl.org>
>>>>> Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> wrote:
> >> Because nnfolder is not your primary mail back end which is not
> >> examined by nnmail-cache-ignore-groups. See nnmail-cache-insert.
> >> Isn't it a bug? I don't understand why it puts non-primary mail
> >> back ends out. Although I have no confidence, I made a patch for
> >> it. I appreciate someone examining it closely.
> > Looking good, IMHO.
> Thanks! I also got to have confidence that it should be fixed.
> Fujishima-san, how about the Gnus CVS head?
Thanks! I tried the Gnus CVS head. But it still exists Gnus-Warning
field. I watched ~/.nnmail-cache file and I notice if recoreded
message is Gcc-ed, the 2nd field does not exist. Is this bug?
% tail ~/.nnmail-cache
<7cu0zlykdo.fsf@totally-fudged-out-message-id> drafts
<NIRPYULEPSQLKRYLPNLDQ@hotmail.com> spam
<20040415.125042.260843572.y-koga@mms.mt.nec.co.jp> list.installer
<407E06F4.6010301@acm.org> list.zsh-users
<XLLSYKVGQPKFLDDBCCFWY@iprolink.ch> spam
<7c4qrlg9o7.fsf@totally-fudged-out-message-id> spam
<407E0A1B.2060703@acm.org> list.zsh-users
<20040415125601.8C91.KAZUHO_HARUKA@yahoo.co.jp> list.antispam-j
<7c3c75g9c0.fsf@totally-fudged-out-message-id> drafts
<7czn9deurf.fsf@nature.tsukuba.ac.jp>
<7czn9deurf.fsf@nature.tsukuba.ac.jp> is a Gcc-ed message.
--
Hiroshi Fujishima
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: nnmail-cache-ignore-groups question
2004-04-15 4:35 ` Hiroshi Fujishima
@ 2004-04-15 6:43 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Katsumi Yamaoka @ 2004-04-15 6:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
>>>>> In <7csmf5c0yj.fsf@nature.tsukuba.ac.jp> Hiroshi Fujishima wrote:
>> I also got to have confidence that it should be fixed.
>> Fujishima-san, how about the Gnus CVS head?
> Thanks! I tried the Gnus CVS head. But it still exists Gnus-Warning
> field. I watched ~/.nnmail-cache file and I notice if recoreded
> message is Gcc-ed, the 2nd field does not exist. Is this bug?
Oops! I completely misunderstood. I've reverted that bogus
change. The problem occurs only by setting
nnmail-cache-accepted-message-ids as non-nil (see the "Fancy
Mail Splitting" info node), and isn't related to the kind of
mail back end.
>>>>> In <7cfzb8qkqn.fsf@nature.tsukuba.ac.jp> Hiroshi Fujishima wrote:
> (setq nnmail-cache-ignore-groups "^nnfolder\\+archive:backup$")
You need to exclude the method name in the regexp as:
(setq nnmail-cache-ignore-groups "^backup$")
The value can be replaced with "\\`backup\\'".
However, users who have set the gcc-self group parameter as t
cannot use such a way in order to avoid Gnus-Warnings, because
the archive group name will change variously.
In addition, I noticed there is another problem. If
nnmail-cache-accepted-message-ids is non-nil, a strange
Message-ID is stored in the nnmail-message-id-cache-file
whenever I begin to write a mail. It is produced when the
nndraft back end makes a draft file for the nndraft:drafts
group. I'm not actually in trouble since I haven't set
nnmail-cache-accepted-message-ids as non-nil, though.
--
Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-04-15 6:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-13 9:40 nnmail-cache-ignore-groups question Hiroshi Fujishima
2004-04-13 11:26 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-04-14 6:59 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-04-14 7:25 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-04-15 4:35 ` Hiroshi Fujishima
2004-04-15 6:43 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).