From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/81217 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Just a bit confused about following gnus devel branch Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:28:41 +0000 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: <7s4nv547va.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> References: <87zkcxpggu.fsf@newsguy.com> <87obtd8ilz.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: ding@gnus.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328456946 28169 80.91.229.3 (5 Feb 2012 15:49:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 15:49:06 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M29498@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Feb 05 16:49:05 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru4Ku-0005QR-ML for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:49:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru4KS-0008CU-6B; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 09:48:36 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru41R-000876-5r for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 09:28:57 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru41P-000642-Qk for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 09:28:56 -0600 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru41N-0002lQ-QE for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:28:53 +0100 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru41L-0004hZ-9a for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:28:51 +0100 Original-Received: from 85.183.18.158 ([85.183.18.158]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:28:51 +0100 Original-Received: from rileyrg by 85.183.18.158 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:28:51 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.183.18.158 Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:JxhHvddIcr08cAiJASJ5KIw7gb4= X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0000 Ham tokens: 0.000-1681--8836h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-1436--7549h-0s--0d--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-1355--7124h-0s--0d--H*u:linux, 0.000-1355--7124h-0s--0d--H*UA:linux, 0.000-1320--6942h-0s--0d--H*UA:gnu Spam tokens: 0.973-29797--5324h-201521s--0d--HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit, 0.934-7975--5020h-74561s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.934-7975--5020h-74561s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.930-7386--5142h-71886s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.924-7289--6014h-76329s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-Internal:quimby.gnus.org Autolearn status: no 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rileyrg[at]gmail.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.2 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.9 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:81217 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 08:17:21 -0500 Harry Putnam wrote: > > HP> I've followed some of the discussion of gnus development plans, > HP> nognus, magnus, but didn't really understand what is happening there. > > HP> I'm left not having a clue of how a gnus users who has tracked > HP> nognus from way back through its other names is to continue tracking > HP> the development branch. > > HP> Can someone say definitively, what git command is required now to > HP> start and continue tracking the development branch of gnus? > > We're doing a basic "branch per release" approach as explained in > http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2007/10/software-branching-and-parallel-universes.html > > The "master" branch is development. Currently that's known as Ma (真) Is "ma" for master? Naming horrors ;) Daily people ask what "no gnus" means in #emacs and similar. I guess its to continue. I too was completely bedazzled by the new changes merely on the basis of the names.