From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/25475 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Toni Drabik Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Expiry Date: 27 Sep 1999 21:30:10 +0200 Organization: [I'm not organized] Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <7t1g1005f0d.fsf@fly.srk.fer.hr> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035162853 14141 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:14:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA06577 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:32:07 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAB26103; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:32:05 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:32:30 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA23620 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:32:20 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from fly.srk.fer.hr (tdrabik@fly.srk.fer.hr [161.53.70.130]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA06554 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:30:20 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from tdrabik@localhost) by fly.srk.fer.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA21236; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 21:30:13 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Toni In-Reply-To: Jody Klymak's message of "27 Sep 1999 12:19:23 -0700" Original-Lines: 26 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070097 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.97) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:25475 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:25475 Jody Klymak writes: > Hi Adam, > > I'm no wiz on these things, but is it correct to set both > auto-expiry and total-expiry to t? I bet you really should only use > one or the other. I personally use total-expiry, with a seven day > grace pesiod on mailing lists and no expiry on personal mail. So for > this mailing list I have [...] > So nothing is expired unless I explicitly set it so. I also set d to > equal E since it makes more sense to me - in my .gnus: > > ;; remap d to E > (define-key gnus-summary-mode-map "d" 'gnus-summary-mark-as-expirable) Is this really necessary, since you are using only total-expire and not auto-expire? Those `E' marks mean something only in auto-expire enabled groups, I believe. -- Toni Drabik Warning: This article may be fatal if swallowed.