From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38200 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jerome.marant@free.fr (=?iso-8859-1?q?J=E9r=F4me?= Marant) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Using nnimap Date: 23 Aug 2001 09:52:47 +0200 Sender: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant?= Message-ID: <7zu1yztdps.fsf@amboise.ird.idealx.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174102 21098 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:21:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:21:42 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 17920 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2001 07:59:30 -0000 Original-Received: from sarajevo.idealx.com (213.41.87.90) by gnus.org with SMTP; 23 Aug 2001 07:59:30 -0000 Original-Received: from singer.ird.idealx.com (singer.ird.idealx.com [192.168.0.1]) by sarajevo.idealx.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f7N7x1K29131 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:59:01 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from amboise.ird.idealx.com (mail@amboise.ird.idealx.com [192.168.0.121]) by singer.ird.idealx.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f7N7x0N16198 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:59:00 +0200 Original-Received: from jerome by amboise.ird.idealx.com with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15ZpIF-0003mV-00 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:52:47 +0200 Original-to: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.104 Original-Lines: 25 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38200 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38200 Simon Josefsson writes: > Also, if you look in the server buffer, is the nnimap server marked as > `opened'? > > Evaluating the following > > M-: (setq imap-log "*imap-log*") RET > > and posting the contents of that buffer (after trying to enter the > group) would also be useful. When I said I got nothing, it meant that these buffers have not been created despite the fact that I correctly evaluated these expressions. When are they meant to be created by gnus, i.e. what triggers their creation? Thanks. -- Jérôme Marant