From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/82778 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: bromley@lavabit.com Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Decode base64 Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 21:59:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <8008.178.170.124.210.1356836392.squirrel@lavabit.com> References: <51506.199.48.147.36.1356071730.squirrel@lavabit.com> <871uej7u6g.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <17329.212.84.206.250.1356261970.squirrel@lavabit.com> <87txrdnekc.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <57287.199.48.147.41.1356493836.squirrel@lavabit.com> <877go5xycf.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356836453 15117 80.91.229.3 (30 Dec 2012 03:00:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 03:00:53 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M31044@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Dec 30 04:01:09 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tp99A-0007mb-BW for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 04:01:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Tp984-0002zV-8y; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 21:00:00 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Tp981-0002zB-Ck for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 20:59:57 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Tp980-000863-5d for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 20:59:57 -0600 Original-Received: from karen.lavabit.com ([72.249.41.33]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tp97y-0008Tx-Hu for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 03:59:54 +0100 Original-Received: from a.earth.lavabit.com (a.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.10]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F39911BC1D for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 20:59:52 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from lavabit.com (hyperion.neuron-network.fr [178.170.124.210]) by lavabit.com with ESMTP id Y9JE8LZD32AA for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 20:59:52 -0600 Original-Received: from 178.170.124.210 (SquirrelMail authenticated user bromley) by lavabit.com with HTTP; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 21:59:52 -0500 (EST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=XH9iEZfB4X/XDLLBY0FV8+ad0KXzxn80/0wX5ay4IxoC2byqujB/hsxuftKA63w86O981AjPV8cZ4owgkS38VtR8uk2EUniKnQaIRv4KhcSrQ/RfVnh4nTVUwmKygfXIyvl1Uf5wsO92GH96YfjlM4SLpKOS4TwbdjwW603bJYg=; h=Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:From:To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; In-Reply-To: <877go5xycf.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13 X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.5503 Ham tokens: 0.001-4--19h-0s--0d--decode, 0.016-1--1h-0s--0d--Decode, 0.081-869--9467h-814s--0d--Does, 0.087-5181--61337h-5723s--0d--doesn't, 0.092-4883--62334h-6198s--0d--doesnt Spam tokens: 0.985-1667--147h-9731s--0d--H*Ad:D*gnus.org, 0.985-1813--165h-10606s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.985-1813--165h-10606s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.985-1710--161h-10032s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.980-1761--217h-10606s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-Internal:quimby.gnus.org Autolearn status: ham -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [72.249.41.33 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5503] 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:82778 Archived-At: >>> Does the article look correct if you copy it to another group? It didn't help. It doesn't look right.